Ronkonkoma
Proposals
Youth Curfew Policy Modification of …

Legislative Bill · Ronkonkoma

Youth Curfew Policy Modification of 2014

Proposed by Green Keynes · fronted by Lawrence Armstrong

Opened

28 Aug 2014

Voting closes

27 Oct 2014

Chambers

2 legislatures

Articles

1 change

Rationale

Limited youth curfew reduces late-night disturbances while protecting supervised activities, balancing public safety with youth development.

Proposed Changes

	Law	Previous		Proposed
1	Youth Curfew Policy	No youth curfew (standard public order laws only)		Limited curfew (Fri–Sat 00:00–04:00; exceptions for work/school events)

1

Youth Curfew Policy

Previous law

No youth curfew (standard public order laws only)

Limited curfew (Fri–Sat 00:00–04:00; exceptions for work/school events)

Proposer

Party

Green Keynes

A party that waters the soil of justice and plants the seeds of shared prosperity for generations to grow beyond greed.

Core pillars

Lawrence Armstrong

Activist · Age 49

999 social followers

A reclusive academic with decades of policy research behind him, Lawrence Armstrong prefers drafting transformative legislation from quiet offices to grandstanding in rallies, his influence wielded through whispered influence in backroom deals and corporate boardrooms alike.

🎓 Academic 🏠 Reclusive 🔗 Well Connected

Timeline

Draft

28 August 2014
Vote Open

28 August 2014
Vote Closed

27 October 2014
Became Law

27 October 2014

Vote tally

Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.

Common Sense House

Passed

123Yes 0No 117Not voted 240 seats

For: 123 / 240 seats (51.3%)

Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 117

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 100.0%)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Democratic Movement (DM)	0	No	No reason given
Green Keynes Proposer	62	Yes	No reason given
Law And Justice	0	No	No reason given
Progressive Freedom Capitalists	0	No	No reason given
Traditionalist Alliance	61	Yes	No reason given

Common Sense Bundestag

Passed

24Yes 0No 24Not voted 48 seats

For: 24 / 48 seats (50.0%)

Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 24

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 100.0%)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Democratic Movement (DM)	0	No	No reason given
Green Keynes Proposer	12	Yes	No reason given
Law And Justice	0	No	No reason given
Progressive Freedom Capitalists	0	No	No reason given
Traditionalist Alliance	12	Yes	No reason given

Presidency

Passed

1Yes 0No 0Not voted 1 seat

For: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)

Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0

Passes unless the office holder votes against (abstention counts as pass)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Traditionalist Alliance	1	Yes	No reason given

Voting record

Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.

No votes cast yet.