These changes modernise policy to balance individual freedom with societal responsibility, ensuring sustainability and fairness in social services.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Press Regulation |
State-recognised self-regulation
|
Purely voluntary self-regulation
|
|
| 2 | Welfare Conditionality |
Light conditions, few sanctions
|
Strict time limits on benefits
|
|
| 3 | Retirement Age Policy |
Retirement at 55
|
Retirement at 60
|
|
| 4 | Homelessness |
Shelters and support services
|
Mix of support and enforcement
|
|
| 5 | Accessibility Standards |
Required in new public buildings only
|
Required in all new buildings and public transport
|
Party
PFC is a modern liberal party built on three principles: progress, freedom and capitalism.
We believe people should have the freedom to live their lives, build businesses, own property, speak freely and pursue their ambitions without unnecessary government interference.
Core pillars
Secretary of the Environment · Age 50
A former reality TV star turned political firebrand, Cynthia Bolton leverages her celebrity status and razor-sharp pragmatism to rally the masses, blending rebellious energy with a knack for turning radical ideas into actionable policy.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 148 / 240 seats (61.7%)
Against: 92 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free Federal Ronkonkoma | 92 | No | These reforms are a scaling back of what we need to be advancing. |
| Hana Liberal | 0 | No | Too harsh. We can only agree with 1 and 5 |
| Progressive Freedom Capitalists Proposer | 148 | Yes | No reason given |
For: 30 / 48 seats (62.5%)
Against: 18 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free Federal Ronkonkoma | 18 | No | These reforms are a scaling back of what we need to be advancing. |
| Hana Liberal | 0 | No | Too harsh. We can only agree with 1 and 5 |
| Progressive Freedom Capitalists Proposer | 30 | Yes | No reason given |
For: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bernadette Fletcher Proposer | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“Too harsh. We can only agree with 1 and 5”
“These reforms are a scaling back of what we need to be advancing.”