Ronkonkoma
Proposals
Foreign Property Ownership Restrictions of …

Legislative Bill · Ronkonkoma

Foreign Property Ownership Restrictions of 2012

Proposed by Green Keynes · fronted by Matthew Smith

Opened

8 Nov 2012

Voting closes

7 Jan 2013

Chambers

2 legislatures

Articles

1 change

Rationale

Limits foreign ownership to commercial property to protect housing affordability for citizens while maintaining economic benefits from foreign investment.

Proposed Changes

	Law	Previous		Proposed
1	Foreign Land Ownership	Foreign purchases require government approval		Foreign ownership limited to commercial property only; residential banned

1

Foreign Land Ownership

Previous law

Foreign purchases require government approval

Foreign ownership limited to commercial property only; residential banned

Proposer

Party

Green Keynes

A party that waters the soil of justice and plants the seeds of shared prosperity for generations to grow beyond greed.

Core pillars

Matthew Smith

Activist · Age 65

1,000 social followers

Matthew Smith left a lucrative career in finance to expose the rot in the system, parlaying his old-boy network into a bridge between idealists and power brokers, all while hosting salons where money and rebellion toast each other with fine whiskey.

✨ Charismatic 🏦 Former Banker 🌟 Idealist 🏙️ Street Smart 🔗 Well Connected

Timeline

Draft

17 October 2012
Vote Open

8 November 2012
Vote Closed

7 January 2013
Became Law

7 January 2013

Vote tally

Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.

Common Sense House

Passed

190Yes 0No 50Not voted 240 seats

For: 190 / 240 seats (79.2%)

Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 50

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 100.0%)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Green Keynes Proposer	69	Yes	No reason given
Progressive Development Initiative	0	Yes	No reason given
The Blues	34	Yes	No reason given
The Republicans	0	No	No reason given
Traditionalist Alliance	87	Yes	No reason given

Common Sense Bundestag

Passed

32Yes 0No 16Not voted 48 seats

For: 32 / 48 seats (66.7%)

Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 16

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 100.0%)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Green Keynes Proposer	9	Yes	No reason given
Progressive Development Initiative	0	Yes	No reason given
The Blues	9	Yes	No reason given
The Republicans	0	No	No reason given
Traditionalist Alliance	14	Yes	No reason given

Presidency

Passed

1Yes 0No 0Not voted 1 seat

For: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)

Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0

Passes unless the office holder votes against (abstention counts as pass)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Traditionalist Alliance	1	Yes	No reason given

Voting record

Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.

No votes cast yet.