These reforms address worker exploitation and economic inequality by ensuring fair wages, safer conditions, and stronger rights while protecting essential services from private profit-driven mismanagement.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Maximum Working Hours |
48-hour weekly maximum
|
40-hour weekly maximum with overtime controls
|
|
| 2 | Gig Economy & Platform Workers |
Platform workers are independent contractors; no protections required
|
Gig workers classified as employees with full rights (sick pay, holiday, pensions)
|
|
| 3 | Minimum Wage Policy |
Basic minimum wage
|
High living wage
|
|
| 4 | Public Ownership of Key Industries |
Full privatisation, market discipline
|
Public ownership of natural monopolies
|
Party
A democratic socialist party focused on workers’ rights, wealth redistribution, strong public services, and environmental protection.
Core pillars
Activist · Age 55
A self-made entrepreneur turned labour advocate, David Friedrich parlayed his streetwise charm and blue-collar instincts into a web of alliances spanning boardrooms and shop floors, always keeping a pragmatic eye on the path to power.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 12 / 69 seats (17.4%)
Against: 41 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 16
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Civic Platform | 5 | No | We are sorry, but this bill treats the free market too harshly |
| Liberal Union | 11 | No | This socialist, no communist policy, will spell the end of this nations prosperity |
| National League For Freedom And Democracy | 9 | No | We cannot accept such a law. |
| National People's Front | 5 | No | Very, Very bad bill. |
| Rhineland Social Front Proposer | 12 | Yes | No reason given |
| The Christian Democrats | 11 | No | NONONONO, NO COMMUNIST RADICALISM. |
For: 113 / 650 seats (17.4%)
Against: 388 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 149
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Civic Platform | 53 | No | We are sorry, but this bill treats the free market too harshly |
| Liberal Union | 101 | No | This socialist, no communist policy, will spell the end of this nations prosperity |
| National League For Freedom And Democracy | 85 | No | We cannot accept such a law. |
| National People's Front | 49 | No | Very, Very bad bill. |
| Rhineland Social Front Proposer | 113 | Yes | No reason given |
| The Christian Democrats | 100 | No | NONONONO, NO COMMUNIST RADICALISM. |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“Very, Very bad bill.”
“NONONONO, NO COMMUNIST RADICALISM.”
“We are sorry, but this bill treats the free market too harshly”
“We cannot accept such a law.”
“This socialist, no communist policy, will spell the end of this nations prosperity”