These reforms modernise policies to reduce state burdens, incentivise work and self-reliance, and ensure secure national identity while cutting public costs.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rent Control |
Light stabilisation, mostly market rents
|
No controls; market sets rents
|
|
| 2 | Social Care for the Elderly |
Free universal social care
|
Capped lifetime care costs
|
|
| 3 | Welfare Conditionality |
Light conditions, few sanctions
|
Mandatory work-for-benefits
|
|
| 4 | National Identity Cards |
Voluntary ID card
|
Mandatory ID card
|
|
| 5 | Citizenship Requirements |
Citizenship by birth on national soil and naturalisation after 5 years' residency
|
Citizenship by blood only (jus sanguinis); 15-year residency for naturalisation
|
Party
Center-right liberal party, which wants to build a great future for the nation through patriotism, free market and economic solidarity in the ordoliberal spirit
Core pillars
Federal Minister of the Interior · Age 61
Raised in a factory town, Paul Mayer spent decades as a labor organizer before turning to politics, where his working-class roots and unshakable idealism now challenge both corporate excess and political cynicism.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 35 / 69 seats (50.7%)
Against: 9 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 25
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Movement | 9 | No | Too restrictive and would leave our most vulnerable in the dark |
| Liberal Union | 15 | Yes | This deregulation is necessary to increase economic output and end wealth fare fraud |
| National League For Freedom And Democracy Proposer | 13 | Yes | No reason given |
| National People's Front | 7 | Yes | It will increase economic growth |
| National Renewal Alliance | 0 | Yes | We need to secure our heritage and traditions as well incentivize work to help grow our economy and compete with our adversaries. |
For: 298 / 650 seats (45.8%)
Against: 99 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 253
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Movement | 99 | No | Too restrictive and would leave our most vulnerable in the dark |
| Liberal Union | 159 | Yes | This deregulation is necessary to increase economic output and end wealth fare fraud |
| National League For Freedom And Democracy Proposer | 90 | Yes | No reason given |
| National People's Front | 49 | Yes | It will increase economic growth |
| National Renewal Alliance | 0 | Yes | We need to secure our heritage and traditions as well incentivize work to help grow our economy and compete with our adversaries. |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“It will increase economic growth”
“Too restrictive and would leave our most vulnerable in the dark”
“This deregulation is necessary to increase economic output and end wealth fare fraud”
“We need to secure our heritage and traditions as well incentivize work to help grow our economy and compete with our adversaries.”