These changes reduce excessive regulation, empowering individuals and businesses to drive economic and social growth through greater freedom and flexibility.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Renewable Energy Mandates |
Nuclear-only energy policy (all fossil and renewable phased out for nuclear)
|
No energy regulation (any fuel source permitted; no environmental standards)
|
|
| 2 | Welfare Conditionality |
Mandatory work-for-benefits
|
Light conditions, few sanctions
|
|
| 3 | Homelessness |
Mix of support and enforcement
|
Shelters and support services
|
|
| 4 | Paid Annual Leave |
No statutory minimum; left to contract
|
Minimal statutory leave
|
|
| 5 | Industrial Pollution & Water |
Industry sets its own standards
|
Industry sets its own standards
|
Party
We plant the seeds of progress today so the harvest of tomorrow feeds every family and fuels every dream.
Core pillars
Activist · Age 34
Once a high-flying investment banker who swapped trading floors for barracks, Anna Herrmann now channels her sharp financial mind into welfare reform, though her unapologetic elite background keeps her at arm’s length from grassroots activists.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 64 / 69 seats (92.8%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 5
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Civic Platform Proposer | 33 | Yes | No reason given |
| Liberal Union | 18 | Yes | good bill, pro market, congrats CP |
| National League For Freedom And Democracy | 8 | Yes | We agree with this proposition. It stimulates development. |
| National People's Front | 5 | Yes | Very good pro-market changes |
| Socialists And Democrats | 0 | No | An overly heterogeneous bill that is completely contrary to our values of environmental protection. We would have voted in favor of legislation on paid leave and subsidies for homeless people. |
| The Christian Democrats | 0 | No | Some laws are good, but there are too many which are too radical. |
For: 523 / 650 seats (80.5%)
Against: 72 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 55
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Civic Platform Proposer | 177 | Yes | No reason given |
| Liberal Union | 190 | Yes | good bill, pro market, congrats CP |
| National League For Freedom And Democracy | 119 | Yes | We agree with this proposition. It stimulates development. |
| National People's Front | 37 | Yes | Very good pro-market changes |
| Socialists And Democrats | 0 | No | An overly heterogeneous bill that is completely contrary to our values of environmental protection. We would have voted in favor of legislation on paid leave and subsidies for homeless people. |
| The Christian Democrats | 72 | No | Some laws are good, but there are too many which are too radical. |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“Very good pro-market changes”
“An overly heterogeneous bill that is completely contrary to our values of environmental protection. We would have voted in favor of legislation on paid leave and subsidies for homeless people.”
“We agree with this proposition. It stimulates development.”
“good bill, pro market, congrats CP”
“Some laws are good, but there are too many which are too radical.”