These changes reduce government overreach and prioritize workforce readiness over costly degrees, protecting civil liberties and public resources.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AI Surveillance & Predictive Policing |
Regulated, warrant-based, targeted use
|
Ban AI surveillance & facial recognition
|
|
| 2 | University Tuition |
Free higher education for all
|
Vocational training focus
|
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 47 / 69 seats (68.1%)
Against: 9 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 13
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Civic Platform | 12 | Yes | Freedom is good for people |
| Kerstin Alliabsen | 0 | No | Bad polecy on all fronts |
| Labour Movement | 9 | No | Do not support gutting access to higher education |
| Liberal Union Proposer | 15 | Yes | No reason given |
| National League For Freedom And Democracy | 13 | Yes | The privacy of our citizens is very important to us |
| National People's Front | 7 | Yes | Good, free market policy |
| Socalist Liberal Front | 0 | Yes | Good for freedom and |
For: 375 / 650 seats (57.7%)
Against: 89 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 186
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Civic Platform | 43 | Yes | Freedom is good for people |
| Kerstin Alliabsen | 0 | No | Bad polecy on all fronts |
| Labour Movement | 89 | No | Do not support gutting access to higher education |
| Liberal Union Proposer | 117 | Yes | No reason given |
| National League For Freedom And Democracy | 177 | Yes | The privacy of our citizens is very important to us |
| National People's Front | 38 | Yes | Good, free market policy |
| Socalist Liberal Front | 0 | Yes | Good for freedom and |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“Good for freedom and”
“Freedom is good for people”
“Good, free market policy”
“Bad polecy on all fronts”
“Do not support gutting access to higher education”
“The privacy of our citizens is very important to us”