“They want dissmantle our nuclear energy industry , its cheap energy for the common man. We are against that. They want to take away our civil liberties in the name of public safety. they did the same in the thirties let that not happen again.”
Public Policy Rebalancing Act of 2019
Rationale
These changes prioritise efficiency and fiscal responsibility by focusing resources on high-impact areas while ensuring essential services remain accessible to those in greatest need.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Police Powers |
Community policing focused on prevention
|
Focus on highest impact crimes
|
|
| 2 | Renewable Energy Mandates |
Nuclear-only energy policy (all fossil and renewable phased out for nuclear)
|
Renewables priority
|
|
| 3 | Childcare Provision |
Universal free childcare
|
Means-tested subsidised childcare
|
|
| 4 | Healthcare System Model |
Single public system, free at point of use
|
Public system with private top-ups
|
|
| 5 | State Surveillance Powers |
Strict privacy protections (right to encryption; no bulk data collection; facial recognition banned)
|
Targeted surveillance (court order required; independent oversight commissioner)
|
1
Police Powers2
Renewable Energy Mandates3
Childcare Provision4
Healthcare System Model5
State Surveillance PowersProposer
Party
National League For Freedom And Democracy
Center-right liberal party, which wants to build a great future for the nation through patriotism, free market and economic solidarity in the ordoliberal spirit
Core pillars
Paul Mayer
Federal Minister of the Interior · Age 61
Raised in a factory town, Paul Mayer spent decades as a labor organizer before turning to politics, where his working-class roots and unshakable idealism now challenge both corporate excess and political cynicism.
Timeline
-
Draft12 September 2019
-
Vote Open12 September 2019
-
Vote Closed11 November 2019
-
Became Law11 November 2019
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Bundesrat
PassedFor: 31 / 69 seats (44.9%)
Against: 14 · Abstained: 5 · Not voted: 19
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Civic Platform | 11 | Yes | We agree on it, however some changes are debatable |
| Labour Movement | 11 | No | We do not want an expanded police state |
| Liberal Union | 10 | Yes | Though this hinders individual liberty, it promotes free market and law and order |
| National League For Freedom And Democracy Proposer | 10 | Yes | No reason given |
| National People's Front | 5 | Abstain | No reason given |
| Rheinland Worker's Union | 0 | No | They want dissmantle our nuclear energy industry , its cheap energy for the common man. We are against that. They want to take away our civil liberties in the name of public safety. they did the same in the thirties let that not happen again. |
| The Christian Democrats | 3 | No | too many policies to agree on anything |
Bundestag
PassedFor: 276 / 650 seats (42.5%)
Against: 125 · Abstained: 34 · Not voted: 215
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Civic Platform | 94 | Yes | We agree on it, however some changes are debatable |
| Labour Movement | 77 | No | We do not want an expanded police state |
| Liberal Union | 97 | Yes | Though this hinders individual liberty, it promotes free market and law and order |
| National League For Freedom And Democracy Proposer | 85 | Yes | No reason given |
| National People's Front | 34 | Abstain | No reason given |
| Rheinland Worker's Union | 0 | No | They want dissmantle our nuclear energy industry , its cheap energy for the common man. We are against that. They want to take away our civil liberties in the name of public safety. they did the same in the thirties let that not happen again. |
| The Christian Democrats | 48 | No | too many policies to agree on anything |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“Though this hinders individual liberty, it promotes free market and law and order”
“We agree on it, however some changes are debatable”
“We do not want an expanded police state”
“too many policies to agree on anything”