These reforms reduce costs while prioritizing essential services, ensuring better use of limited public funds for critical news/education and supporting early workforce contribution.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Public Broadcasting Funding |
Major public broadcaster (multi-channel; ad-free; funded by general taxation)
|
Limited public broadcaster (news/education remit; funded by small household levy)
|
|
| 2 | School Leaving Age |
Compulsory education/training to 18
|
Compulsory to 16
|
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 40 / 69 seats (58.0%)
Against: 9 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 20
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Civic Platform | 12 | Yes | We think these are decent, proper changes, LU are the Goats |
| Labour Movement | 9 | No | We should not be gutting the public broadcaster |
| Liberal Union Proposer | 15 | Yes | No reason given |
| National League For Freedom And Democracy | 13 | Yes | Breaking up one television monopoly will be beneficial for the market |
For: 381 / 650 seats (58.6%)
Against: 99 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 170
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Civic Platform | 132 | Yes | We think these are decent, proper changes, LU are the Goats |
| Labour Movement | 99 | No | We should not be gutting the public broadcaster |
| Liberal Union Proposer | 159 | Yes | No reason given |
| National League For Freedom And Democracy | 90 | Yes | Breaking up one television monopoly will be beneficial for the market |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We think these are decent, proper changes, LU are the Goats”
“We should not be gutting the public broadcaster”
“Breaking up one television monopoly will be beneficial for the market”