För att stärka samhällsskyddet, säkra veteraners välfärd och skydda nationell mark genom moderna, inkluderande och hållbara förändringar.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Military Service Policy |
Volunteer professional army
|
National service for those 18-20
|
|
| 2 | Women in the Armed Forces |
Equal Participation — women serve alongside men on equal terms
|
At Her Request — women may serve but are exempt from conscription
|
|
| 3 | Renewable Energy Mandates |
Nuclear-only energy policy (all fossil and renewable phased out for nuclear)
|
Renewables priority
|
|
| 4 | Veterans' Affairs |
Guaranteed housing, healthcare, pensions for veterans
|
Guaranteed housing, healthcare, pensions for veterans
|
|
| 5 | Foreign Land Ownership |
Foreign ownership limited to commercial property only; residential banned
|
Foreign ownership limited to commercial property only; residential banned
|
Party
We lift the shoulders of working families with arms strong as oak and hearts fierce as flame. The future is built here.
Core pillars
Activist · Age 36
Lukas Jung’s unorthodox takes and encyclopedic policy expertise made him a viral sensation, though his social missteps and eccentric antics often overshadow his sharp academic mind.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 4 / 69 seats (5.8%)
Against: 39 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 26
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conservatist Liberal Alliance | 0 | No | This proposal is a disaster. |
| Liberal Union | 20 | No | I don't see the immediate danger that would require conscription, and it hurts free market |
| National League For Freedom And Democracy | 15 | No | There is no need to introduce compulsory military conscription |
| National People's Front | 4 | No | Compulsory conscription is unnecessary. |
| Open Future Alliance | 0 | Abstain | No reason given |
| United Working Families Proposer | 4 | Yes | No reason given |
For: 67 / 650 seats (10.3%)
Against: 351 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 232
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conservatist Liberal Alliance | 29 | No | This proposal is a disaster. |
| Liberal Union | 95 | No | I don't see the immediate danger that would require conscription, and it hurts free market |
| National League For Freedom And Democracy | 164 | No | There is no need to introduce compulsory military conscription |
| National People's Front | 63 | No | Compulsory conscription is unnecessary. |
| Open Future Alliance | 0 | Abstain | No reason given |
| United Working Families Proposer | 67 | Yes | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“Compulsory conscription is unnecessary.”
“I don't see the immediate danger that would require conscription, and it hurts free market”
“There is no need to introduce compulsory military conscription”
“This proposal is a disaster.”