Open Future Alliance
Voted March 18, 2021
Abstain
These changes reduce unnecessary bureaucracy while maintaining transparency, giving citizens clearer insight into political influence without stifling civic engagement.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lobbying & Political Donations |
Strict caps and a public lobbying register
|
Disclosure rules, few limits
|
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 39 / 69 seats (56.5%)
Against: 4 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 26
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conservatist Liberal Alliance | 0 | Yes | The market can just thank this proposal. |
| Liberal Union | 20 | Yes | This is a good pro market reform |
| National League For Freedom And Democracy | 15 | Yes | We agree with this proposal |
| National People's Front Proposer | 4 | Yes | No reason given |
| Open Future Alliance | 0 | Abstain | No reason given |
| United Working Families | 4 | No | Money should come from the people not big cooperations. |
For: 311 / 650 seats (47.8%)
Against: 105 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 234
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conservatist Liberal Alliance | 39 | Yes | The market can just thank this proposal. |
| Liberal Union | 139 | Yes | This is a good pro market reform |
| National League For Freedom And Democracy | 91 | Yes | We agree with this proposal |
| National People's Front Proposer | 42 | Yes | No reason given |
| Open Future Alliance | 0 | Abstain | No reason given |
| United Working Families | 105 | No | Money should come from the people not big cooperations. |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“The market can just thank this proposal.”
“Money should come from the people not big cooperations.”
“We agree with this proposal”
“This is a good pro market reform”