Shifting to guaranteed housing-first support ends cycles of homelessness more effectively by prioritizing stable housing over punitive measures, improving community safety and wellbeing.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Homelessness |
Mix of support and enforcement
|
Guaranteed housing-first support
|
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 28 / 69 seats (40.6%)
Against: 28 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 13
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Civic Platform | 12 | Yes | decreasing homelessnes decreases crimes and street violence |
| Kerstin Alliabsen | 0 | Yes | Yeah why not slay purr |
| Labour Movement | 9 | Yes | We support housing first proposals |
| Liberal Union | 15 | No | The taxpayer should not be voting for this kind of irresponsible spending |
| National League For Freedom And Democracy | 13 | No | Too much handout for freeloaders |
| National People's Front Proposer | 7 | Yes | No reason given |
For: 280 / 650 seats (43.1%)
Against: 249 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 121
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Civic Platform | 132 | Yes | decreasing homelessnes decreases crimes and street violence |
| Kerstin Alliabsen | 0 | Yes | Yeah why not slay purr |
| Labour Movement | 99 | Yes | We support housing first proposals |
| Liberal Union | 159 | No | The taxpayer should not be voting for this kind of irresponsible spending |
| National League For Freedom And Democracy | 90 | No | Too much handout for freeloaders |
| National People's Front Proposer | 49 | Yes | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“Yeah why not slay purr”
“Too much handout for freeloaders”
“We support housing first proposals”
“The taxpayer should not be voting for this kind of irresponsible spending”
“decreasing homelessnes decreases crimes and street violence”