Removes costly, complex regulations to reduce government interference and spur economic growth while ensuring only basic protections for animal welfare and energy safety.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Animal Welfare Standards |
Regulated farming standards and anti-cruelty laws
|
Basic anti-cruelty rules only (no regulation of farming practices)
|
|
| 2 | Renewable Energy Mandates |
No energy regulation (any fuel source permitted; no environmental standards)
|
No energy regulation (any fuel source permitted; no environmental standards)
|
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 21 / 69 seats (30.4%)
Against: 18 · Abstained: 11 · Not voted: 19
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal Union Proposer | 13 | Yes | No reason given |
| National League For Freedom And Democracy | 8 | Yes | We agree with this proposal |
| Socialists And Democrats | 18 | No | At odds with our commitments to protecting the environment and reducing emissions |
| The Christian Democrats | 11 | Abstain | No reason given |
For: 309 / 650 seats (47.5%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 131 · Not voted: 210
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal Union Proposer | 190 | Yes | No reason given |
| National League For Freedom And Democracy | 119 | Yes | We agree with this proposal |
| Socialists And Democrats | 0 | No | At odds with our commitments to protecting the environment and reducing emissions |
| The Christian Democrats | 131 | Abstain | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“At odds with our commitments to protecting the environment and reducing emissions”
“We agree with this proposal”