These reforms balance civil liberties with modern safety needs, reducing risks of violence and exploitation while protecting public rights and freedoms.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Right to Protest |
Unrestricted right to assemble
|
Right to protest with prior notice
|
|
| 2 | Firearms Control |
Broad right to own with light checks
|
Licensed ownership with background checks
|
|
| 3 | National Identity Cards |
Mandatory ID card
|
Mandatory biometric ID + central register
|
|
| 4 | Online Safety & Social Media |
Minimal duties, free-speech priority
|
Targeted child-safety duties
|
|
| 5 | Adult Content |
Legal with strict age verification
|
Unrestricted adult content
|
Party
A party of strength and order where tradition stands firm and the future is forged by those who earn it.
Core pillars
Activist · Age 54
A lifelong union organiser from a steelworker’s family, Helga rose through local politics by delivering tangible results rather than ideological purity, earning a reputation for unshakable loyalty and a knack for turning media scandals into strength.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 2 / 69 seats (2.9%)
Against: 41 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 26
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alternative Rheinland Proposer | 2 | Yes | stronger security, responsible freedoms, and targeted protections for Rheinland’s citizens. |
| Civic Platform | 33 | No | Too socialist for us |
| National Democrats | 0 | No | Can't vote yes. Articles 3 and 4 could result in state surveillance |
| National League For Freedom And Democracy | 8 | No | A strange law. On the one hand, it severely restricts freedoms, on the other widens them. We are simply in favor of increasing civil liberties, not introducing several changes into one law. |
| The Christian Democrats | 0 | No | This is too radical, change must happen not quickly, but gradual |
For: 26 / 650 seats (4.0%)
Against: 372 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 252
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alternative Rheinland Proposer | 26 | Yes | stronger security, responsible freedoms, and targeted protections for Rheinland’s citizens. |
| Civic Platform | 297 | No | Too socialist for us |
| National Democrats | 0 | No | Can't vote yes. Articles 3 and 4 could result in state surveillance |
| National League For Freedom And Democracy | 75 | No | A strange law. On the one hand, it severely restricts freedoms, on the other widens them. We are simply in favor of increasing civil liberties, not introducing several changes into one law. |
| The Christian Democrats | 0 | No | This is too radical, change must happen not quickly, but gradual |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“This is too radical, change must happen not quickly, but gradual”
“Too socialist for us”
“A strange law. On the one hand, it severely restricts freedoms, on the other widens them. We are simply in favor of increasing civil liberties, not introducing several changes into one law.”
“Can't vote yes. Articles 3 and 4 could result in state surveillance”
“stronger security, responsible freedoms, and targeted protections for Rheinland’s citizens.”