These changes prioritise national sovereignty, security, and self-sufficiency by tightening immigration, strengthening economic control, and focusing education on practical skills for public good.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Asylum & Refugees |
Meet international obligations only
|
Strict processing, limited support
|
|
| 2 | Citizenship Requirements |
Citizenship by birth; naturalisation after 2 years' residency
|
Citizenship by birth on national soil and naturalisation after 5 years' residency
|
|
| 3 | Deportation |
Case-by-case with full appeal rights
|
Firm enforcement with appeals
|
|
| 4 | Public Ownership of Key Industries |
Private, with strong regulation
|
Public ownership of natural monopolies
|
|
| 5 | University Tuition |
Tuition fees
|
Vocational training focus
|
Party
A movement for hard work and clear borders. We build futures without apology and guard tradition with unshaken hands.
Core pillars
Activist · Age 61
Rising from a working-class upbringing, Pilar Torres became the party’s most devoted advocate, using her commanding oratory and unwavering loyalty to leadership to bridge divides and mobilize both elite and grassroots supporters.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 136 / 300 seats (45.3%)
Against: 51 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 113
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compassionate Collective | 51 | No | Whilst the Collective would align well with the focus on vocational training and reining in private monopolies, the increased law enforcement and regulations around immigration disheartens many voters whom the Collective represents. As such the Collective would reject this bill, but it will be open to abstaining if it sees the bill garnering more support in the National Congress to prevent the Presidency from overruling Congress |
| National Moderation League | 0 | Abstain | While prone to agree to certain policies, The Rigidity, extremist and isolationalist proposal force us to abstain Despite being close coalition partners |
| New Peoples’ Alliance Proposer | 136 | Yes | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 94 | Not voted |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compassionate Collective | 1 | No | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“While prone to agree to certain policies, The Rigidity, extremist and isolationalist proposal force us to abstain Despite being close coalition partners”
“Whilst the Collective would align well with the focus on vocational training and reining in private monopolies, the increased law enforcement and regulations around immigration disheartens many voters whom the Collective represents. As such the Collective would reject this bill, but it will be open to abstaining if it sees the bill garnering more support in the National Congress to prevent the Presidency from overruling Congress”