These changes reduce youth harm and housing instability by limiting alcohol access and protecting renters from excessive price hikes while not robbing the market of its potiential. This provides for all citizens.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alcohol Regulation |
Liberal policy (age 18; moderate tax; late opening permitted; public zones allowed)
|
Strict regulation (age 21; high excise; retail 10:00–20:00; public drinking banned)
|
|
| 2 | Rent Control |
Light stabilisation, mostly market rents
|
Rent increases capped to inflation
|
Party
The National Moderation League is a moderate nationalist party committed to preserving the nation's unity, sovereignty, and long-term prosperity through pragmatic and responsible governance.
Core pillars
Activist · Age 27
A former finance prodigy who walked away from a lucrative banking career after uncovering corruption, now wielding his street-smart pragmatism and ruthless efficiency to reshape political strategy from the ground up.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 29 / 300 seats (9.7%)
Against: 187 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 84
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compassionate Collective | 51 | No | While the Collective would support the use of rent controls for the betterment of the people from being exploited by the market, the inclusion of the stricter alcohol article - which would undo the change enacted by our ‘Liberal Drinking Act 2019’ - means we must vote against the NML proposal in order to protect individual liberty, individual responsibility and the integrity of the Collective |
| National Moderation League Proposer | 29 | Yes | No reason given |
| New Peoples’ Alliance | 136 | No | People will pay what the market decides there is no reason for the state to be involved in a consumer - landlord relationship |
| Empty seats | 94 | Not voted |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Peoples’ Alliance | 1 | No | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“People will pay what the market decides there is no reason for the state to be involved in a consumer - landlord relationship”
“While the Collective would support the use of rent controls for the betterment of the people from being exploited by the market, the inclusion of the stricter alcohol article - which would undo the change enacted by our ‘Liberal Drinking Act 2019’ - means we must vote against the NML proposal in order to protect individual liberty, individual responsibility and the integrity of the Collective”