“We can't be to open this can I make it possible turn military operations or even turn government necessity that need to stay secret. It could be shared with the public. Therefore letting our enemies understanding our tactics”
Government Transparency Act of 2023
Rationale
Current limited transparency obscures spending, deals and decisions—this change ensures full public access to prevent misuse and rebuild trust.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Government Transparency |
Freedom-of-information system with security exemptions
|
Open by default; contracts, meetings and expenses all published
|
1
Government TransparencyProposer
Party
Liberal Center
This is a pragmatic center-liberal party focused on modernizing governance and driving economic innovation. Rejecting ideological extremism, it delivers data-driven solutions and reforms to secure growth and opportunity for all.
Core pillars
Stephen Nicholson
Activist · Age 47
Once a rising star in the entertainment world, he traded fame for firebrands, now wielding his golden voice and youthful vigor to ignite radical change across the political landscape.
Timeline
-
Draft7 November 2023
-
Vote Open19 November 2023
-
Vote Closed18 January 2024
-
Did Not Become Law18 January 2024
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
National Assembly
FailedFor: 31 / 100 seats (31.0%)
Against: 69 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic Socialist Of The Northsea | 16 | No | We can't be to open this can I make it possible turn military operations or even turn government necessity that need to stay secret. It could be shared with the public. Therefore letting our enemies understanding our tactics |
| Liberal Center Proposer | 31 | Yes | No reason given |
| Northsea National Union | 18 | No | Our party supports transparency, but national security must come first. The current law already provides public access while protecting sensitive security information. Removing those explicit exemptions risks exposing defence contracts, meetings and spending that should remain confidential. Accountability should not weaken Northsea’s security. |
| The Northsea Rally | 35 | No | It is not safe to include securtiy sectors in the law. |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“It is not safe to include securtiy sectors in the law.”
“For defense-related matter, we agree to keep it secret. The rest could be open. We must first amend the constitution to exclude defense and security matters from transparency.”
“Our party supports transparency, but national security must come first. The current law already provides public access while protecting sensitive security information. Removing those explicit exemptions risks exposing defence contracts, meetings and spending that should remain confidential. Accountability should not weaken Northsea’s security.”