These reforms restore fairness: stronger banks protect deposits, tighter consumer rights curb profiteering, public ownership secures essential services, robust strike rights defend workers, and breaking monopolies fosters real competition.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Banking & Financial Regulation |
Strong prudential oversight
|
Capital controls, separated retail/investment banking
|
|
| 2 | Consumer Protection |
Statutory refund/replace for faulty goods within a set period; basic safety standards
|
Multi-year warranties, no-quibble refunds for faulty goods, enforced safety standards
|
|
| 3 | Public Ownership of Key Industries |
Privatise and lightly regulate
|
Nationalise all key utilities and transport
|
|
| 4 | Right to Strike |
Protected with a lawful ballot
|
Unrestricted right to strike, incl. solidarity action
|
|
| 5 | Competition & Monopolies |
Permissive on mergers and scale
|
Proactively break up dominant firms
|
Party
A force of labor and justice rising from the docks to the halls of power to reshape the economy for workers
Core pillars
Activist · Age 27
Rising from a local union organizer to a rising star in communications, Pearson’s razor-sharp rhetoric and unshakable loyalty to the leadership made him the party’s youngest speechwriter—and a key figure in crafting its public narrative.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 64 / 100 seats (64.0%)
Against: 30 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 6
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic Socialist Of The Northsea | 38 | Yes | There are rights for workers as well as it becomes a bit more stable with our system of government that we the people |
| Liberal Center | 30 | No | Against because they would give the government too much control over businesses and workers, increase bureaucracy and potentially reduce competition and economic freedom |
| North Sea Workers' Alliance Proposer | 26 | Yes | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“There are rights for workers as well as it becomes a bit more stable with our system of government that we the people”
“Against because they would give the government too much control over businesses and workers, increase bureaucracy and potentially reduce competition and economic freedom”