“This law is absolutely unacceptable and colossal; we cannot allow this if we are a free society. This infringes on civil and individual rights in every respect”
Stricter Justice And Security Act of 2021
Rationale
These changes enhance public safety by lowering criminal responsibility, strengthening penalties for violent crimes, and improving deterrence through stricter policing and sentencing.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Age of Criminal Responsibility |
From age 12
|
Criminally responsible from age 10
|
|
| 2 | Capital Punishment |
No death penalty
|
Death penalty for murder, treason, and drug trafficking
|
|
| 3 | Armed Police |
Mostly unarmed; specialist armed units on call
|
Police routinely carry military-grade weapons
|
|
| 4 | Repeat Offender Sentencing |
Judges set sentences case-by-case
|
"Three strikes" — life on third serious offence
|
|
| 5 | Police Powers |
Community policing focused on prevention
|
Zero tolerance
|
1
Age of Criminal Responsibility2
Capital Punishment3
Armed Police4
Repeat Offender Sentencing5
Police PowersProposer
Party
Conservative Movement
A party of resolute guardians defending national pride and prosperity against the tides of chaos and decline.
Core pillars
Gertrud Günther
Activist · Age 59
Once a high-flying investment banker, Gertrud Günther abandoned Wall Street for the political battlefield, wielding both her family’s fortune and razor-sharp analysis to reshape the party’s economic vision with unwavering loyalty.
Timeline
-
Draft31 January 2021
-
Vote Open31 January 2021
-
Vote Closed1 April 2021
-
Did Not Become Law1 April 2021
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Bundesrat
FailedFor: 3 / 7 seats (42.9%)
Against: 4 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative Movement Proposer | 3 | Yes | No reason given |
| Democratic Socialist Union | 2 | No | This is a barbaric proposal |
| Libertarian Nationalist | 0 | No | Some we agree with but some are too harsh. |
| Reformist League Of Matterhorn | 2 | No | This law is absolutely unacceptable and colossal; we cannot allow this if we are a free society. This infringes on civil and individual rights in every respect |
Ständerat
FailedFor: 13 / 46 seats (28.3%)
Against: 33 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative Movement Proposer | 13 | Yes | No reason given |
| Democratic Socialist Union | 25 | No | This is a barbaric proposal |
| Libertarian Nationalist | 0 | No | Some we agree with but some are too harsh. |
| Reformist League Of Matterhorn | 8 | No | This law is absolutely unacceptable and colossal; we cannot allow this if we are a free society. This infringes on civil and individual rights in every respect |
Nationalrat
FailedFor: 56 / 200 seats (28.0%)
Against: 144 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative Movement Proposer | 56 | Yes | No reason given |
| Democratic Socialist Union | 108 | No | This is a barbaric proposal |
| Libertarian Nationalist | 0 | No | Some we agree with but some are too harsh. |
| Reformist League Of Matterhorn | 36 | No | This law is absolutely unacceptable and colossal; we cannot allow this if we are a free society. This infringes on civil and individual rights in every respect |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“Some we agree with but some are too harsh.”
“This is a barbaric proposal”