Our borders are bleeding and our national heritage is under siege. The Protect Our Blood Act defends the very life and ancestry of our nation against demographic erasure. We will secure our homeland, halt foreign replacement, and preserve our bloodline for future generations!
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Asylum & Refugees |
Meet international obligations only
|
Offshore processing and detention
|
|
| 2 | Citizenship Requirements |
Citizenship by birth on national soil and naturalisation after 5 years' residency
|
Citizenship by blood only (jus sanguinis); 15-year residency for naturalisation
|
|
| 3 | Deportation |
Case-by-case with full appeal rights
|
Automatic removal, limited appeals
|
|
| 4 | Integration Requirements |
Standard language/civics requirements
|
Strict language + values tests, mandatory classes
|
|
| 5 | Banking & Financial Regulation |
Strong prudential oversight
|
Deregulated financial centre
|
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 3 / 7 seats (42.9%)
Against: 4 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative Movement Proposer | 3 | Yes | No reason given |
| Liberal Front | 0 | No | We reject this bill that hurt our economy |
| Reformist League Of Matterhorn | 1 | No | Reason: All of these proposals, except the last article, go against our pillar of open borders and free movement |
| Social Labour Union | 3 | No | It is not needed simply. |
For: 12 / 46 seats (26.1%)
Against: 34 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative Movement Proposer | 12 | Yes | No reason given |
| Liberal Front | 0 | No | We reject this bill that hurt our economy |
| Reformist League Of Matterhorn | 10 | No | Reason: All of these proposals, except the last article, go against our pillar of open borders and free movement |
| Social Labour Union | 24 | No | It is not needed simply. |
For: 52 / 200 seats (26.0%)
Against: 148 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative Movement Proposer | 52 | Yes | No reason given |
| Liberal Front | 0 | No | We reject this bill that hurt our economy |
| Reformist League Of Matterhorn | 42 | No | Reason: All of these proposals, except the last article, go against our pillar of open borders and free movement |
| Social Labour Union | 106 | No | It is not needed simply. |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We reject this bill that hurt our economy”
“It is not needed simply.”
“Reason: All of these proposals, except the last article, go against our pillar of open borders and free movement”