Unregulated internet maximizes free expression, innovation, and user autonomy, fostering open discourse and economic growth without government overreach.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Internet Freedom |
Moderate regulation (illegal content removed; platforms must verify age; data rules enforced)
|
Completely unregulated internet; no content restrictions of any kind
|
Party
A party of builders workers and dreamers stitching together a future where no one is left behind and the planet thrives.
Core pillars
Activist · Age 52
A longtime architect of the party’s policy platform, Nina Krause’s sharp intellect and unshakable loyalty to its ideals have made her both a trusted advisor and a formidable defender of its principles in public debate.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 2 / 7 seats (28.6%)
Against: 3 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 2
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative Movement | 3 | No | We finally don't support this bill |
| Democratic Socialist Union Proposer | 2 | Yes | No reason given |
| Libertarian Nationalist | 0 | No | We believe there needs to be some restrictions and also to note that the data privacy is more important to work on rather than internet freedom; if you could get on that please. By banning all personal data collection by private companies! |
| Reformist League Of Matterhorn | 0 | Abstain | We're concerned about internet deregulation, but not in a strict or moderate way, rather a balanced one. Eliminating age verification is fine, but what about illegal content? That's worrying |
For: 25 / 46 seats (54.3%)
Against: 13 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 8
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative Movement | 13 | No | We finally don't support this bill |
| Democratic Socialist Union Proposer | 25 | Yes | No reason given |
| Libertarian Nationalist | 0 | No | We believe there needs to be some restrictions and also to note that the data privacy is more important to work on rather than internet freedom; if you could get on that please. By banning all personal data collection by private companies! |
| Reformist League Of Matterhorn | 0 | Abstain | We're concerned about internet deregulation, but not in a strict or moderate way, rather a balanced one. Eliminating age verification is fine, but what about illegal content? That's worrying |
For: 108 / 200 seats (54.0%)
Against: 56 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 36
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative Movement | 56 | No | We finally don't support this bill |
| Democratic Socialist Union Proposer | 108 | Yes | No reason given |
| Libertarian Nationalist | 0 | No | We believe there needs to be some restrictions and also to note that the data privacy is more important to work on rather than internet freedom; if you could get on that please. By banning all personal data collection by private companies! |
| Reformist League Of Matterhorn | 0 | Abstain | We're concerned about internet deregulation, but not in a strict or moderate way, rather a balanced one. Eliminating age verification is fine, but what about illegal content? That's worrying |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We finally don't support this bill”
“We're concerned about internet deregulation, but not in a strict or moderate way, rather a balanced one. Eliminating age verification is fine, but what about illegal content? That's worrying”
“We have ultimately decided to vote in favor of this bill, driven by our desire for mediation and to defuse tensions!”
“We believe there needs to be some restrictions and also to note that the data privacy is more important to work on rather than internet freedom; if you could get on that please. By banning all personal data collection by private companies!”
“This completely unregulated internet project is a sham that plunges our society into digital chaos. Under the guise of absolute freedom, it abolishes all moderation, tolerating the worst: online harassment, fake news, illegal content, and exposing our children to unacceptable dangers. The total absence of rules is not freedom, it is the law of the jungle and digital anarchy. A responsible state must protect its citizens, regulate web giants, and guarantee a safe, civilized virtual space, rather than capitulating to libertarian fundamentalism. Rejecting this madness is an imperative for public order and the protection of youth!”