Proposed by Conservative Movement in Matterhorn
Opening this package cost 90 PP.
Current wording is shown as it was when voting began.
The time for stagnation is over. By maintaining an anachronistic 48-month term in a world where a day passes in an hour, we condemn Matterhorn to inertia and our democracy to asphyxiation. Such a delay amounts to months of real-world waiting, which is the graveyard of civic energy. Shifting to a 12-month cycle is a vital necessity. It is the precise balance required to allow leaders to carry out genuine reforms while guaranteeing a simultaneous, rigorous, and cohabitation-free renewal of all our institutions. Democracy is not a privilege exercised once every millennium, it is a constant battle. Let us not fear the verdict of the ballot box, let us provoke it. Let us adopt this reform so that Matterhorn remains a living, bold nation resolutely turned toward the future.
For: 7 / 7 seats (100.0%) — needs 67.0%
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative Movement Proposer | 2 | Yes | No reason given |
| Democratic Socialist Union | 4 | Yes | we support this proposal |
| Reformist League Of Matterhorn | 1 | Yes | Well, it's not what we expected, like 5 or 4 months, but compared to how it is now, with 48 months of waiting and actual months of waiting as well, this one is better and equally acceptable |
For: 46 / 46 seats (100.0%) — needs 67.0%
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative Movement Proposer | 13 | Yes | No reason given |
| Democratic Socialist Union | 25 | Yes | we support this proposal |
| Reformist League Of Matterhorn | 8 | Yes | Well, it's not what we expected, like 5 or 4 months, but compared to how it is now, with 48 months of waiting and actual months of waiting as well, this one is better and equally acceptable |
For: 200 / 200 seats (100.0%) — needs 67.0%
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative Movement Proposer | 56 | Yes | No reason given |
| Democratic Socialist Union | 108 | Yes | we support this proposal |
| Reformist League Of Matterhorn | 36 | Yes | Well, it's not what we expected, like 5 or 4 months, but compared to how it is now, with 48 months of waiting and actual months of waiting as well, this one is better and equally acceptable |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“we support this proposal”
“Well, it's not what we expected, like 5 or 4 months, but compared to how it is now, with 48 months of waiting and actual months of waiting as well, this one is better and equally acceptable”