“Aunque rescates el punto de la educación en el hogar, los primeros tres puntos meten tanta regulación estatal en la economía y el mercado laboral que destrozan los principios económicos del liberalismo. Las trabas a la libertad de empresa y de contratación pesan más en este paquete.”
Workers' Rights And Education Reform of 2021
Rationale
These reforms modernize labor rights, reduce exploitation, and improve education quality by ensuring fair wages, worker protections, and balanced civic learning over ceremonial compliance.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Homeschooling Regulation |
Homeschooling prohibited; all children must attend licensed schools
|
Homeschooling allowed with curriculum standards, testing, and inspections
|
|
| 2 | National Anthem in Schools |
Mandatory daily anthem (all students present; opt-out only for documented reasons)
|
No anthem in schools (civics taught without ceremonies)
|
|
| 3 | Gig Economy & Platform Workers |
Platform workers are independent contractors; no protections required
|
Gig workers classified as employees with full rights (sick pay, holiday, pensions)
|
|
| 4 | Maximum Working Hours |
No statutory limit on working hours
|
35-hour weekly maximum
|
|
| 5 | Minimum Wage Policy |
No minimum wage
|
High living wage
|
1
Homeschooling Regulation2
National Anthem in Schools3
Gig Economy & Platform Workers4
Maximum Working Hours5
Minimum Wage PolicyProposer
Party
The Left
A party of the people for the people. Strong hands build strong walls. No one left behind.
Core pillars
Antoine Fournier
Presidency · Age 48
Born into old money, his natural magnetism and sharp strategic mind positioned him as a rising star, though his privileged background occasionally clashed with his party’s populist rhetoric.
Timeline
-
Draft19 March 2021
-
Vote Open23 March 2021
-
Vote Closed22 May 2021
-
Did Not Become Law22 May 2021
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Senate
FailedFor: 0 / 348 seats (0.0%)
Against: 194 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 154
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Movimiento Liberal Nacional | 0 | No | Aunque rescates el punto de la educación en el hogar, los primeros tres puntos meten tanta regulación estatal en la economía y el mercado laboral que destrozan los principios económicos del liberalismo. Las trabas a la libertad de empresa y de contratación pesan más en este paquete. |
| The Left Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| The Marianne Liberty Alliance | 59 | No | We are against penalizing the impoverishing to benefit the middle class by restriction full-time job working hours |
| The National Refoundation Front | 135 | No | We don't support this bill |
National Assembly
FailedFor: 51 / 577 seats (8.8%)
Against: 403 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 123
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Movimiento Liberal Nacional | 40 | No | Aunque rescates el punto de la educación en el hogar, los primeros tres puntos meten tanta regulación estatal en la economía y el mercado laboral que destrozan los principios económicos del liberalismo. Las trabas a la libertad de empresa y de contratación pesan más en este paquete. |
| The Left Proposer | 51 | Yes | No reason given |
| The Marianne Liberty Alliance | 136 | No | We are against penalizing the impoverishing to benefit the middle class by restriction full-time job working hours |
| The National Refoundation Front | 227 | No | We don't support this bill |
Presidency
FailedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| The National Refoundation Front | 1 | No | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We are against penalizing the impoverishing to benefit the middle class by restriction full-time job working hours”
“We don't support this bill”