“We cannot support turning out nation into an exclusionary state”
Strict Immigration Policy Act of 2019
Rationale
Strengthen national security and cohesion by prioritizing strict immigration controls to ensure fair, sustainable integration and public safety.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Asylum & Refugees |
Meet international obligations only
|
Strict processing, limited support
|
|
| 2 | Citizenship Requirements |
Citizenship by birth; naturalisation after 2 years' residency
|
Citizenship by birth on national soil and naturalisation after 5 years' residency
|
|
| 3 | Deportation |
Case-by-case with full appeal rights
|
Firm enforcement with appeals
|
|
| 4 | Immigration Quota Policy |
No quotas, open immigration
|
Annual quotas with caps
|
|
| 5 | Integration Requirements |
Standard language/civics requirements
|
Strict language + values tests, mandatory classes
|
1
Asylum & Refugees2
Citizenship Requirements3
Deportation4
Immigration Quota Policy5
Integration RequirementsProposer
Party
The National Refoundation Front
The National Refoundation Front is the bold voice of a new era. We stand for uncompromising national sovereignty, strict border security, and a dynamic free-market economy. By restoring our foundational values and unleashing our true potential, we are building a stronger future.
Core pillars
Hélène Robert
Activist · Age 38
A former student protest leader turned firebrand orator, Hélène Robert rose to fame by leading stormy rallies that forced concessions from politicians, earning a reputation as a ruthless tactician who knows how to weaponize public anger against the establishment.
Timeline
-
Draft14 December 2019
-
Vote Open14 December 2019
-
Vote Closed12 February 2020
-
Did Not Become Law12 February 2020
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Senate
FailedFor: 132 / 348 seats (37.9%)
Against: 216 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marianne's Communist Front | 43 | No | The MCF is taking a firm stand for the "No" vote. Immigrants must be supported, integrated, well-paid, and assisted; only in this way can they truly become an asset. Furthermore, many proposals violate fundamental human rights. |
| National Conservative Rally | 53 | Yes | We obviously support this great bill |
| The Greens Of Marianne | 104 | No | We do not support this bill. |
| The Marianne Liberty Alliance | 69 | No | We cannot support turning out nation into an exclusionary state |
| The National Refoundation Front Proposer | 79 | Yes | No reason given |
National Assembly
FailedFor: 190 / 577 seats (32.9%)
Against: 387 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marianne's Communist Front | 164 | No | The MCF is taking a firm stand for the "No" vote. Immigrants must be supported, integrated, well-paid, and assisted; only in this way can they truly become an asset. Furthermore, many proposals violate fundamental human rights. |
| National Conservative Rally | 79 | Yes | We obviously support this great bill |
| The Greens Of Marianne | 166 | No | We do not support this bill. |
| The Marianne Liberty Alliance | 57 | No | We cannot support turning out nation into an exclusionary state |
| The National Refoundation Front Proposer | 111 | Yes | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 218 | Not voted |
Presidency
FailedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Greens Of Marianne | 1 | No | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“The MCF is taking a firm stand for the "No" vote. Immigrants must be supported, integrated, well-paid, and assisted; only in this way can they truly become an asset. Furthermore, many proposals violate fundamental human rights.”
“We obviously support this great bill”
“We do not support this bill.”