“We cannot support mass surveillance and a biometric ID registry.”
Strengthened Security And Enforcement Act of 2020
Rationale
Stronger national security requires robust identification, strict enforcement, and decisive crime prevention for public safety.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | National Identity Cards |
Voluntary ID card
|
Mandatory biometric ID + central register
|
|
| 2 | Police Powers |
Community policing focused on prevention
|
Zero tolerance
|
|
| 3 | Capital Punishment |
Death penalty constitutionally prohibited; extradition refused to countries that use it
|
Death penalty for premeditated murder only
|
|
| 4 | Armed Police |
Mostly unarmed; specialist armed units on call
|
Police routinely carry military-grade weapons
|
|
| 5 | State Surveillance Powers |
Targeted surveillance (court order required; independent oversight commissioner)
|
Mass surveillance (warrantless wiretaps; facial recognition in public spaces)
|
1
National Identity Cards2
Police Powers3
Capital Punishment4
Armed Police5
State Surveillance PowersProposer
Party
The National Refoundation Front
The National Refoundation Front is the bold voice of a new era. We stand for uncompromising national sovereignty, strict border security, and a dynamic free-market economy. By restoring our foundational values and unleashing our true potential, we are building a stronger future.
Core pillars
Philippe Dubois
Activist · Age 59
Having worked his way up from a factory floor to a senior role in a media empire, Philippe Dubois combines sharp analytical skills with an unmatched knack for shaping narratives, all while remaining deeply connected to the struggles of working-class families.
Timeline
-
Draft8 June 2020
-
Vote Open8 June 2020
-
Vote Closed7 August 2020
-
Did Not Become Law7 August 2020
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Senate
FailedFor: 79 / 348 seats (22.7%)
Against: 173 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 96
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Democrats (D) | 0 | Yes | This bill would be necessary for community safety and protecting individual rights. After the Animal Welfare act, this bill would ensure safety precautions are met. |
| The Greens Of Marianne | 104 | No | We will never support the implementation of the death penalty in any context. |
| The Marianne Liberty Alliance | 69 | No | We cannot support mass surveillance and a biometric ID registry. |
| The National Refoundation Front Proposer | 79 | Yes | No reason given |
| The People Vanguard | 0 | No | We dont support the death penalty and the excessive arming of the Police |
National Assembly
PassedFor: 246 / 577 seats (42.6%)
Against: 218 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 113
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Democrats (D) | 40 | Yes | This bill would be necessary for community safety and protecting individual rights. After the Animal Welfare act, this bill would ensure safety precautions are met. |
| The Greens Of Marianne | 146 | No | We will never support the implementation of the death penalty in any context. |
| The Marianne Liberty Alliance | 72 | No | We cannot support mass surveillance and a biometric ID registry. |
| The National Refoundation Front Proposer | 206 | Yes | No reason given |
| The People Vanguard | 0 | No | We dont support the death penalty and the excessive arming of the Police |
| Empty seats | 218 | Not voted |
Presidency
FailedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Greens Of Marianne | 1 | No | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We will never support the implementation of the death penalty in any context.”
“We dont support the death penalty and the excessive arming of the Police”
“This bill would be necessary for community safety and protecting individual rights. After the Animal Welfare act, this bill would ensure safety precautions are met.”