“This would make sense as around 60 our aging population tends to be fragile and unworkable.”
Retirement Age Adjustment Act of 2020
Rationale
Lowering retirement age to 60 supports older workers' health and allows younger generations fairer job access while sustaining economic productivity.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Retirement Age Policy |
Retirement at 65
|
Retirement at 60
|
1
Retirement Age PolicyProposer
Party
The Greens Of Marianne
The Greens of Marianne (GoM) is the party of the youth and progress, advocating for education-first policies, environmental protections and striving towards a brighter future for generations to come.
Core pillars
Gabriel François
Activist · Age 50
Gabriel François, a celebrated academic and public intellectual, combines rigorous analysis with a magnetic presence, turning complex policy debates into movements with his unmatched ability to inspire.
Timeline
-
Draft16 March 2020
-
Vote Open16 March 2020
-
Vote Closed15 May 2020
-
Did Not Become Law15 May 2020
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Senate
FailedFor: 104 / 348 seats (29.9%)
Against: 148 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 96
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Democrats (D) | 0 | Yes | This would make sense as around 60 our aging population tends to be fragile and unworkable. |
| The Greens Of Marianne Proposer | 104 | Yes | No reason given |
| The Marianne Liberty Alliance | 69 | No | We can no destroy our economy with perverse incentives while bankrupting our nation |
| The National Refoundation Front | 79 | No | Lowering the retirement age to 60 by state decree is a destructive illusion. This so-called social gift will be paid for by an explosion of debt, confiscatory taxes, and the suffocation of the free market. It will not help our seniors; it will impoverish the entire nation by destroying the value of work and individual responsibility. The welfare state is not a solution, it is the problem. The RNF defends economic freedom, effort, and sustainable prosperity, not a collectivist rush forward! |
National Assembly
FailedFor: 166 / 577 seats (28.8%)
Against: 168 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 243
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Democrats (D) | 0 | Yes | This would make sense as around 60 our aging population tends to be fragile and unworkable. |
| The Greens Of Marianne Proposer | 166 | Yes | No reason given |
| The Marianne Liberty Alliance | 57 | No | We can no destroy our economy with perverse incentives while bankrupting our nation |
| The National Refoundation Front | 111 | No | Lowering the retirement age to 60 by state decree is a destructive illusion. This so-called social gift will be paid for by an explosion of debt, confiscatory taxes, and the suffocation of the free market. It will not help our seniors; it will impoverish the entire nation by destroying the value of work and individual responsibility. The welfare state is not a solution, it is the problem. The RNF defends economic freedom, effort, and sustainable prosperity, not a collectivist rush forward! |
| Empty seats | 218 | Not voted |
Presidency
PassedFor: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Greens Of Marianne Proposer | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We can no destroy our economy with perverse incentives while bankrupting our nation”
“Lowering the retirement age to 60 by state decree is a destructive illusion. This so-called social gift will be paid for by an explosion of debt, confiscatory taxes, and the suffocation of the free market. It will not help our seniors; it will impoverish the entire nation by destroying the value of work and individual responsibility. The welfare state is not a solution, it is the problem. The RNF defends economic freedom, effort, and sustainable prosperity, not a collectivist rush forward!”