“We will not support this unnecessary militarization; rearmament of the state leads to authoritarian regimes”
National Service And Defense Expansion Act of 2023
Rationale
These changes strengthen national security by enhancing self-reliance, deterring threats, and supporting economic growth through defense industries. Marianne must remain a strong and safe nation on the global stage.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Military Service Policy |
Volunteer professional army
|
National service for those 18-20
|
|
| 2 | Nuclear Weapons |
Maintain a minimal deterrent
|
Expand the nuclear arsenal
|
|
| 3 | Arms Exports |
Licensed exports with end-use checks
|
Sell arms with minimal restriction
|
1
Military Service Policy2
Nuclear Weapons3
Arms ExportsProposer
Party
Alternative For Marianne
A movement that answers chaos with discipline and decline with defiance.
Core pillars
Léa Garcia
Activist · Age 43
Léa Garcia learned to read the room before she learned to read by selling contraband newspapers at factory gates, later turning that street-smart savvy into a sharp media strategist who can spin a crisis into a campaign talking point with a single broadcast.
Timeline
-
Draft26 October 2023
-
Vote Open26 October 2023
-
Vote Closed25 December 2023
-
Did Not Become Law25 December 2023
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Senate
FailedFor: 138 / 348 seats (39.7%)
Against: 210 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alternative For Marianne Proposer | 42 | Yes | No reason given |
| The Left | 62 | No | Alternative for Marianne want to bring our country into war. We oppose this bill. |
| The Marianne Liberty Alliance | 79 | No | We absolutely do not need a draft |
| The National Refoundation Front | 96 | Yes | Great ! Really great ! |
| The Social-Democrats | 37 | No | Far too radical for us to support. |
| Together For Marianne | 32 | No | We will not support this unnecessary militarization; rearmament of the state leads to authoritarian regimes |
| Workers Union Of Marianne | 0 | Abstain | No reason given |
National Assembly
FailedFor: 236 / 577 seats (40.9%)
Against: 341 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alternative For Marianne Proposer | 133 | Yes | No reason given |
| The Left | 126 | No | Alternative for Marianne want to bring our country into war. We oppose this bill. |
| The Marianne Liberty Alliance | 93 | No | We absolutely do not need a draft |
| The National Refoundation Front | 103 | Yes | Great ! Really great ! |
| The Social-Democrats | 92 | No | Far too radical for us to support. |
| Together For Marianne | 30 | No | We will not support this unnecessary militarization; rearmament of the state leads to authoritarian regimes |
| Workers Union Of Marianne | 0 | Abstain | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 218 | Not voted |
Presidency
FailedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 1 | No | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“Great ! Really great !”
“We absolutely do not need a draft”
“Alternative for Marianne want to bring our country into war. We oppose this bill.”
“Far too radical for us to support.”