“This bill is a pragmatic and courageous step forward for our energy and economic independence. Rather than submitting to foreign supply dependence and deindustrialization, it is time to responsibly exploit our own resources. Allowing licensed and regulated extraction gives us the means to revive our manufacturing industry, create sustainable local jobs, and generate essential revenues to invest in the well-being of our citizens. This is the alliance of common sense, economic realism, and national sovereignty. We vote yes to restored prosperity!”
Mining Act of 2022
Rationale
We have many untapped resources we can use to domestically boost manufacturing industries, or sell it for extra money we can invest in our citizens, this allows for regulations but provides more freedom.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fossil Fuel Extraction |
Managed wind-down
|
Licensed extraction with limits
|
1
Fossil Fuel ExtractionProposer
Party
The United Conservatives
The United Conservatives builds a better and brighter future for the young population
Core pillars
Jean Dupont
Activist · Age 44
A former factory worker turned union representative, Jean Dupont rose through the ranks by exposing corruption in local politics while never wavering from his principles—earning a reputation as a media savvy firebrand who never softens his message for the cameras.
Timeline
-
Draft24 February 2022
-
Vote Open24 February 2022
-
Vote Closed25 April 2022
-
Did Not Become Law25 April 2022
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Senate
FailedFor: 143 / 348 seats (41.1%)
Against: 157 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 48
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 119 | No | This proposal is a step back on environmental issues |
| The Marianne Liberty Alliance | 38 | No | We are already on this path, diverting from it damages our economy. |
| The National Refoundation Front | 93 | Yes | This bill is a pragmatic and courageous step forward for our energy and economic independence. Rather than submitting to foreign supply dependence and deindustrialization, it is time to responsibly exploit our own resources. Allowing licensed and regulated extraction gives us the means to revive our manufacturing industry, create sustainable local jobs, and generate essential revenues to invest in the well-being of our citizens. This is the alliance of common sense, economic realism, and national sovereignty. We vote yes to restored prosperity! |
| The United Conservatives Proposer | 50 | Yes | No reason given |
National Assembly
PassedFor: 249 / 577 seats (43.2%)
Against: 236 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 92
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 142 | No | This proposal is a step back on environmental issues |
| The Marianne Liberty Alliance | 94 | No | We are already on this path, diverting from it damages our economy. |
| The National Refoundation Front | 168 | Yes | This bill is a pragmatic and courageous step forward for our energy and economic independence. Rather than submitting to foreign supply dependence and deindustrialization, it is time to responsibly exploit our own resources. Allowing licensed and regulated extraction gives us the means to revive our manufacturing industry, create sustainable local jobs, and generate essential revenues to invest in the well-being of our citizens. This is the alliance of common sense, economic realism, and national sovereignty. We vote yes to restored prosperity! |
| The United Conservatives Proposer | 81 | Yes | No reason given |
Presidency
FailedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 1 | No | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We are already on this path, diverting from it damages our economy.”
“This proposal is a step back on environmental issues”