These reforms modernize military readiness, education equity, economic resilience, housing access, and worker wellbeing with evidence-based public benefits.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Women in the Armed Forces |
Equal Participation — women serve alongside men on equal terms
|
This Is An Order — a mandatory quota for the proportion of women in the armed forces
|
|
| 2 | State-Funded Faith Schools |
Permit existing state-funded faith schools
|
State funds secular schools only
|
|
| 3 | Retirement Age Policy |
Retirement at 65
|
Retirement at 55
|
|
| 4 | Housing Supply & Planning |
Balanced planning system
|
Strong national housing targets
|
|
| 5 | Maximum Working Hours |
40-hour weekly maximum with overtime controls
|
35-hour weekly maximum
|
Party
A movement of thinkers builders and dreamers forging a free nation where education empowers and industry thrives beyond tradition's shadow
Core pillars
Activist · Age 60
A veteran of public battles, her commanding stage presence and media savvy have made her the party’s most electrifying voice, weaving policy debates into compelling narratives.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 0 / 348 seats (0.0%)
Against: 161 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 187
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| National Conservative Rally | 0 | Abstain | Retirement at 55 and the 35-hour weekly maximum would be a disaster for Marianne's economy and a mandatory quota for women's is a shame for our gender equality. GO NATIONAL-CONSERVATIVE!! |
| New Popular Front Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| The Greens Of Marianne | 0 | Yes | The Greens supports all of these proposals. |
| The Marianne Liberty Alliance | 72 | No | While we may agree with some provisions of the bill, the pro-poverty work restrictions are not something we can support on ethical grounds. |
| The National Refoundation Front | 89 | No | This reform is nothing more than a project to dismantle our society under the guise of social progress. Imposing mandatory gender quotas in our armed forces is an insult to merit and military effectiveness: aptitude must take precedence over ideology. Likewise, the brutal exclusion of funding for faith-based schools is a direct attack on our cultural and spiritual heritage, aimed at molding our children into a forced secularist uniform. We refuse to sacrifice the nation's competitiveness and the sense of duty on the altar of generalized welfare that destroys the value of work. We say NO to this demagogic reform. |
For: 0 / 577 seats (0.0%)
Against: 273 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 304
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| National Conservative Rally | 0 | Abstain | Retirement at 55 and the 35-hour weekly maximum would be a disaster for Marianne's economy and a mandatory quota for women's is a shame for our gender equality. GO NATIONAL-CONSERVATIVE!! |
| New Popular Front Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| The Greens Of Marianne | 0 | Yes | The Greens supports all of these proposals. |
| The Marianne Liberty Alliance | 188 | No | While we may agree with some provisions of the bill, the pro-poverty work restrictions are not something we can support on ethical grounds. |
| The National Refoundation Front | 85 | No | This reform is nothing more than a project to dismantle our society under the guise of social progress. Imposing mandatory gender quotas in our armed forces is an insult to merit and military effectiveness: aptitude must take precedence over ideology. Likewise, the brutal exclusion of funding for faith-based schools is a direct attack on our cultural and spiritual heritage, aimed at molding our children into a forced secularist uniform. We refuse to sacrifice the nation's competitiveness and the sense of duty on the altar of generalized welfare that destroys the value of work. We say NO to this demagogic reform. |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Marianne Liberty Alliance | 1 | No | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“The Greens supports all of these proposals.”
“While we may agree with some provisions of the bill, the pro-poverty work restrictions are not something we can support on ethical grounds.”
“Retirement at 55 and the 35-hour weekly maximum would be a disaster for Marianne's economy and a mandatory quota for women's is a shame for our gender equality. GO NATIONAL-CONSERVATIVE!!”
“This reform is nothing more than a project to dismantle our society under the guise of social progress. Imposing mandatory gender quotas in our armed forces is an insult to merit and military effectiveness: aptitude must take precedence over ideology. Likewise, the brutal exclusion of funding for faith-based schools is a direct attack on our cultural and spiritual heritage, aimed at molding our children into a forced secularist uniform. We refuse to sacrifice the nation's competitiveness and the sense of duty on the altar of generalized welfare that destroys the value of work. We say NO to this demagogic reform.”