“We support this bill”
Immigration Act of 2022
Rationale
This bill prioritizes immigrants who are willing to integrate with society and (optionally) can keep their cultural ties. Quality over quantity.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Integration Requirements |
Standard language/civics requirements
|
Strict language + values tests, mandatory classes
|
|
| 2 | Asylum & Refugees |
Meet international obligations only
|
Strict processing, limited support
|
1
Integration Requirements2
Asylum & RefugeesProposer
Party
The United Conservatives
The United Conservatives builds a better and brighter future for the young population
Core pillars
Charles David
Activist · Age 38
A sharp-elbowed strategist who cut his teeth in corporate communications before pivoting to politics, Charles David is the architect of hard-nosed campaign tactics, using media manipulation and cold data to crush opponents in pursuit of power.
Timeline
-
Draft14 August 2022
-
Vote Open14 August 2022
-
Vote Closed13 October 2022
-
Did Not Become Law13 October 2022
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Senate
FailedFor: 133 / 348 seats (38.2%)
Against: 156 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 59
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 72 | No | There is no need to restric immigration laws |
| The Marianne Liberty Alliance | 54 | No | We oppose undue restrictions to immigration |
| The National Refoundation Front | 71 | Yes | We support this bill |
| The Social-Democrats | 30 | No | We do not agree with this proposal. |
| The United Conservatives Proposer | 62 | Yes | No reason given |
National Assembly
FailedFor: 225 / 577 seats (39.0%)
Against: 242 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 110
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 133 | No | There is no need to restric immigration laws |
| The Marianne Liberty Alliance | 92 | No | We oppose undue restrictions to immigration |
| The National Refoundation Front | 126 | Yes | We support this bill |
| The Social-Democrats | 17 | No | We do not agree with this proposal. |
| The United Conservatives Proposer | 99 | Yes | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 218 | Not voted |
Presidency
FailedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Marianne Liberty Alliance | 1 | No | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We do not agree with this proposal.”
“There is no need to restric immigration laws”
“We oppose undue restrictions to immigration”