Gig corporations exploit working-class labor by denying basic human protections. We must end this exploitation. Guaranteeing minimum pay and accident insurance restores dignity to platform workers, secures their safety, and ensures labor is protected over profit.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gig Economy & Platform Workers |
Platform workers are independent contractors; no protections required
|
Basic protections (minimum pay, accident insurance) for gig workers
|
Party
A Democratic Socialist Movement that focuses on the citizens needs and the regular people. The right of free education, healthcare, and fair wages shall be for everyone.
Core pillars
Activist · Age 33
A scholar turned policy wonk, François Muller cut his teeth in community organizing before pivoting to academia, where he mastered the art of distilling complex ideas into winning narratives—both in research papers and prime-time debates.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 119 / 348 seats (34.2%)
Against: 143 · Abstained: 72 · Not voted: 14
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 119 | Yes | We support this proposal |
| The Marianne Liberty Alliance | 72 | Abstain | We do not oppose protections, yet still believe they are private contractors |
| The National Refoundation Front | 93 | No | This social-democratic bill is a frontal attack on the freedom to enterprise and the flexibility that drive the success of the platform economy. By imposing rigid constraints and disguised employment burdens on independent workers, this text will destroy thousands of flexible jobs and penalize those who choose autonomy. Over-regulating independent work under the guise of social protection is ignoring the reality of platforms and killing economic innovation. Instead of helping active workers, this measure standardizes and weighs down a dynamic sector that offers a welcome alternative to traditional employment. We vote no to this stifling state control! |
| The Social-Democrats Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| The United Conservatives | 50 | No | Gig workers are independent contractors with their own flexible schedule, it wouldnt make sense to provide them basic protections. we reject this bill |
For: 150 / 577 seats (26.0%)
Against: 225 · Abstained: 114 · Not voted: 88
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 133 | Yes | We support this proposal |
| The Marianne Liberty Alliance | 114 | Abstain | We do not oppose protections, yet still believe they are private contractors |
| The National Refoundation Front | 126 | No | This social-democratic bill is a frontal attack on the freedom to enterprise and the flexibility that drive the success of the platform economy. By imposing rigid constraints and disguised employment burdens on independent workers, this text will destroy thousands of flexible jobs and penalize those who choose autonomy. Over-regulating independent work under the guise of social protection is ignoring the reality of platforms and killing economic innovation. Instead of helping active workers, this measure standardizes and weighs down a dynamic sector that offers a welcome alternative to traditional employment. We vote no to this stifling state control! |
| The Social-Democrats Proposer | 17 | Yes | No reason given |
| The United Conservatives | 99 | No | Gig workers are independent contractors with their own flexible schedule, it wouldnt make sense to provide them basic protections. we reject this bill |
| Empty seats | 218 | Not voted |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 1
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We do not oppose protections, yet still believe they are private contractors”
“We support this proposal”
“Gig workers are independent contractors with their own flexible schedule, it wouldnt make sense to provide them basic protections. we reject this bill”
“This social-democratic bill is a frontal attack on the freedom to enterprise and the flexibility that drive the success of the platform economy. By imposing rigid constraints and disguised employment burdens on independent workers, this text will destroy thousands of flexible jobs and penalize those who choose autonomy. Over-regulating independent work under the guise of social protection is ignoring the reality of platforms and killing economic innovation. Instead of helping active workers, this measure standardizes and weighs down a dynamic sector that offers a welcome alternative to traditional employment. We vote no to this stifling state control!”