Gig workers lack job security & benefits, leaving them vulnerable. Full employee status ensures fair wages, safety nets, and dignity for millions.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gig Economy & Platform Workers |
Basic protections (minimum pay, accident insurance) for gig workers
|
Gig workers classified as employees with full rights (sick pay, holiday, pensions)
|
Party
A party of the people for the people. Strong hands build strong walls. No one left behind.
Core pillars
Presidency · Age 48
Born into old money, his natural magnetism and sharp strategic mind positioned him as a rising star, though his privileged background occasionally clashed with his party’s populist rhetoric.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 137 / 348 seats (39.4%)
Against: 185 · Abstained: 26 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alternative For Marianne | 35 | No | They are not employees. They are independent contractors and self-employed. |
| The Left Proposer | 68 | Yes | No reason given |
| The Marianne Liberty Alliance | 62 | No | gig workers are not employees, otherwise they wouldn't be "gig" workers |
| The National Refoundation Front | 88 | No | We can't support this bill |
| The Social-Democrats | 69 | Yes | This was what we wanted to eventually chang into when our party first came with this basic protections doctrine. One step at a time. Yes! |
| Together For Marianne | 26 | Abstain | We have a middle ground on this |
For: 183 / 577 seats (31.7%)
Against: 353 · Abstained: 32 · Not voted: 9
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alternative For Marianne | 73 | No | They are not employees. They are independent contractors and self-employed. |
| The Left Proposer | 103 | Yes | No reason given |
| The Marianne Liberty Alliance | 135 | No | gig workers are not employees, otherwise they wouldn't be "gig" workers |
| The National Refoundation Front | 145 | No | We can't support this bill |
| The Social-Democrats | 80 | Yes | This was what we wanted to eventually chang into when our party first came with this basic protections doctrine. One step at a time. Yes! |
| Together For Marianne | 32 | Abstain | We have a middle ground on this |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| The National Refoundation Front | 1 | No | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We have a middle ground on this”
“We can't support this bill”
“They are not employees. They are independent contractors and self-employed.”
“gig workers are not employees, otherwise they wouldn't be "gig" workers”
“This was what we wanted to eventually chang into when our party first came with this basic protections doctrine. One step at a time. Yes!”