“We cannot support restrictions that only serve to reduce our tax bases needed for social programs”
Foreign Land Ownership Regulation of 2019
Rationale
Prevents exploitation of national assets and ensures land sales align with economic and security priorities.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Foreign Land Ownership |
No restrictions on foreign land purchases
|
Foreign purchases require government approval
|
1
Foreign Land OwnershipTimeline
-
Draft6 December 2019
-
Vote Open6 December 2019
-
Vote Closed4 February 2020
-
Became Law4 February 2020
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Senate
PassedFor: 290 / 348 seats (83.3%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 58
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marianne's Communist Front | 0 | Yes | We support this bill. |
| National Conservative Rally | 0 | No | We dont support this bill |
| The Greens Of Marianne Proposer | 290 | Yes | No reason given |
| The Marianne Liberty Alliance | 0 | No | We cannot support restrictions that only serve to reduce our tax bases needed for social programs |
| The National Refoundation Front | 0 | No | This text suffers from statism and a deeply anti-liberal vision. Entrusting the government bureaucracy with discretionary power to authorize or ban land purchases is a collectivist drift that kills Marianne's economic attractiveness and tramples on the fundamental right to private property. The liberalism we defend is based on freedom of contract and trust in the market, not on arbitrary administrative locks that pave the way for cronyism. Rather than punishing investment with suffocating controls worthy of a planned economy, we must preserve our sovereignty through competitiveness and the strength of our laws. The RNF refuses to endorse such bureaucratic interventionism which suffocates the free economy. |
National Assembly
PassedFor: 330 / 577 seats (57.2%)
Against: 247 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marianne's Communist Front | 164 | Yes | We support this bill. |
| National Conservative Rally | 79 | No | We dont support this bill |
| The Greens Of Marianne Proposer | 166 | Yes | No reason given |
| The Marianne Liberty Alliance | 57 | No | We cannot support restrictions that only serve to reduce our tax bases needed for social programs |
| The National Refoundation Front | 111 | No | This text suffers from statism and a deeply anti-liberal vision. Entrusting the government bureaucracy with discretionary power to authorize or ban land purchases is a collectivist drift that kills Marianne's economic attractiveness and tramples on the fundamental right to private property. The liberalism we defend is based on freedom of contract and trust in the market, not on arbitrary administrative locks that pave the way for cronyism. Rather than punishing investment with suffocating controls worthy of a planned economy, we must preserve our sovereignty through competitiveness and the strength of our laws. The RNF refuses to endorse such bureaucratic interventionism which suffocates the free economy. |
| Empty seats | 218 | Not voted |
Presidency
PassedFor: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Greens Of Marianne Proposer | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We support this bill.”
“We dont support this bill”
“This text suffers from statism and a deeply anti-liberal vision. Entrusting the government bureaucracy with discretionary power to authorize or ban land purchases is a collectivist drift that kills Marianne's economic attractiveness and tramples on the fundamental right to private property. The liberalism we defend is based on freedom of contract and trust in the market, not on arbitrary administrative locks that pave the way for cronyism. Rather than punishing investment with suffocating controls worthy of a planned economy, we must preserve our sovereignty through competitiveness and the strength of our laws. The RNF refuses to endorse such bureaucratic interventionism which suffocates the free economy.”