Education, Social Security & Press Freedom Act of 2009
Rationale
The right to stable housing, non-interference of politics in religion and public education, the right to access non-corporatised, unbiased media sourced, and a strong, free press should be held sacrosanct. This act will enshrine personal liberty, dignity and freedoms in our laws.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Religious Education in Schools |
Optional religious classes
|
Strictly secular education
|
|
| 2 | Media Censorship Policy |
Targeted regulation (post-publication fines for incitement/defamation; independent regulator)
|
Free press (no prior restraints; narrow limits for direct incitement only)
|
|
| 3 | Religious Observation Policy |
Tax-exempt status for registered religious charities
|
Permit religion with no state support (neutral tax treatment; no grants)
|
|
| 4 | housing_policy |
moderate_subsidies
|
mass_social_housing
|
|
| 5 | Public Broadcasting Funding |
Limited public broadcaster (news/education remit; funded by small household levy)
|
Major public broadcaster (multi-channel; ad-free; funded by general taxation)
|
1
Religious Education in Schools2
Media Censorship Policy3
Religious Observation Policy4
housing_policy5
Public Broadcasting FundingProposer
Party
United Imperial Alliance
The UIA guards the sacred flame of secularism, rule of law and personal liberty against powers that seek to extinguish it.
Core pillars
Marguerite Chevalier
Activist · Age 43
Marguerite Chevalier, the heiress to a powerful family fortune, channels her wealth and fiery idealism into radical activism, using her vast network to amplify the party’s message—but her blunt honesty often lands her in awkward social situations.
Timeline
-
Draft1 April 2009
-
Vote Open1 April 2009
-
Vote Closed31 May 2009
-
Did Not Become Law31 May 2009
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Senate
FailedFor: 99 / 348 seats (28.4%)
Against: 118 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 131
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Union Blue & Rouge | 118 | No | No reason given |
| United Imperial Alliance Proposer | 99 | Yes | No reason given |
National Assembly
FailedFor: 164 / 577 seats (28.4%)
Against: 196 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 217
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Union Blue & Rouge | 196 | No | No reason given |
| United Imperial Alliance Proposer | 164 | Yes | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 218 | Not voted |
Presidency
FailedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Union Blue & Rouge | 1 | No | No reason given |