“Votamos en contra de esta reforma porque profundiza la intervención del Estado en la economía mediante el control de precios en los alquileres y la estatización de sectores clave. Estas medidas asfixian la libre competencia, desincentivan la inversión privada y limitan la autonomía económica de los ciudadanos.”
Economic And Social Policy Reforms of 2021
Rationale
These changes strengthen affordability, economic fairness, public infrastructure control and secular education while protecting existing rights and services.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rent Control |
Light stabilisation, mostly market rents
|
Rent increases capped to inflation
|
|
| 2 | National Identity Cards |
Mandatory biometric ID + central register
|
Mandatory ID card
|
|
| 3 | State-Funded Faith Schools |
Permit existing state-funded faith schools
|
No new state-funded faith schools
|
|
| 4 | Public Ownership of Key Industries |
Nationalise all key utilities and transport
|
Public ownership of natural monopolies
|
1
Rent Control2
National Identity Cards3
State-Funded Faith Schools4
Public Ownership of Key IndustriesProposer
Party
The Left
A party of the people for the people. Strong hands build strong walls. No one left behind.
Core pillars
Antoine Fournier
Presidency · Age 48
Born into old money, his natural magnetism and sharp strategic mind positioned him as a rising star, though his privileged background occasionally clashed with his party’s populist rhetoric.
Timeline
-
Draft18 February 2021
-
Vote Open18 February 2021
-
Vote Closed19 April 2021
-
Did Not Become Law19 April 2021
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Senate
FailedFor: 0 / 348 seats (0.0%)
Against: 194 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 154
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Movimiento Liberal Nacional | 0 | No | Votamos en contra de esta reforma porque profundiza la intervención del Estado en la economía mediante el control de precios en los alquileres y la estatización de sectores clave. Estas medidas asfixian la libre competencia, desincentivan la inversión privada y limitan la autonomía económica de los ciudadanos. |
| The Left Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| The Marianne Liberty Alliance | 59 | No | We cannot support nationalizations nor rent caps that drive up housing prices and force aggressive harmful gentrification |
| The National Refoundation Front | 135 | No | This far-left program, led by Antoine Fournier and The Left, is a true poison for our economy and our freedoms. It is a dangerous, destructive, and profoundly collectivist project aimed at destroying the very foundations of our prosperity. Rent controls pegged to inflation will paralyze the real estate market, cause a chronic housing shortage, and discourage private investment. Nationalizing natural monopolies means resurrecting the worst eras of inefficient, burdensome, and corrupt state management. Finally, banning new faith-based schools while weakening traditional reference points betrays a dogmatic desire to regiment society. Let us make no mistake: The Left is not seeking justice, but total state control over citizens. We have rejected this Marxist folly to preserve freedom, enterprise, and the future of our nation. |
National Assembly
FailedFor: 51 / 577 seats (8.8%)
Against: 403 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 123
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Movimiento Liberal Nacional | 40 | No | Votamos en contra de esta reforma porque profundiza la intervención del Estado en la economía mediante el control de precios en los alquileres y la estatización de sectores clave. Estas medidas asfixian la libre competencia, desincentivan la inversión privada y limitan la autonomía económica de los ciudadanos. |
| The Left Proposer | 51 | Yes | No reason given |
| The Marianne Liberty Alliance | 136 | No | We cannot support nationalizations nor rent caps that drive up housing prices and force aggressive harmful gentrification |
| The National Refoundation Front | 227 | No | This far-left program, led by Antoine Fournier and The Left, is a true poison for our economy and our freedoms. It is a dangerous, destructive, and profoundly collectivist project aimed at destroying the very foundations of our prosperity. Rent controls pegged to inflation will paralyze the real estate market, cause a chronic housing shortage, and discourage private investment. Nationalizing natural monopolies means resurrecting the worst eras of inefficient, burdensome, and corrupt state management. Finally, banning new faith-based schools while weakening traditional reference points betrays a dogmatic desire to regiment society. Let us make no mistake: The Left is not seeking justice, but total state control over citizens. We have rejected this Marxist folly to preserve freedom, enterprise, and the future of our nation. |
Presidency
FailedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| The National Refoundation Front | 1 | No | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We cannot support nationalizations nor rent caps that drive up housing prices and force aggressive harmful gentrification”
“This far-left program, led by Antoine Fournier and The Left, is a true poison for our economy and our freedoms. It is a dangerous, destructive, and profoundly collectivist project aimed at destroying the very foundations of our prosperity. Rent controls pegged to inflation will paralyze the real estate market, cause a chronic housing shortage, and discourage private investment. Nationalizing natural monopolies means resurrecting the worst eras of inefficient, burdensome, and corrupt state management. Finally, banning new faith-based schools while weakening traditional reference points betrays a dogmatic desire to regiment society. Let us make no mistake: The Left is not seeking justice, but total state control over citizens. We have rejected this Marxist folly to preserve freedom, enterprise, and the future of our nation.”