“We do not support this proposal.”
Economic And Social Policy Reform Act of 2022
Rationale
These reforms modernise policy by reducing government control, empowering communities, and fostering economic growth while upholding social responsibility and inclusivity. If you oppose this, you are evil!
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Public Ownership of Key Industries |
Nationalise all key utilities and transport
|
Privatise and lightly regulate
|
|
| 2 | Mobile Phones in Schools |
Smartphones banned on school grounds
|
Left to teacher discretion
|
|
| 3 | Immigration Quota Policy |
Annual quotas with caps
|
No quotas, open immigration
|
|
| 4 | Asylum & Refugees |
Meet international obligations only
|
Generous resettlement and support
|
|
| 5 | National Identity Cards |
Mandatory ID card
|
Voluntary ID card
|
1
Public Ownership of Key Industries2
Mobile Phones in Schools3
Immigration Quota Policy4
Asylum & Refugees5
National Identity CardsProposer
Party
The Marianne Liberty Alliance
The Marianne Liberty Alliance supports proven policy in order to create the best outcomes domestically and internationally. The Marianne Liberty Alliance believes in a free, but regulated market to foster prosperity.
Core pillars
Caroline Faure
Minister of the Economy and Finance · Age 39
Caroline Faure went from law school debater to media darling overnight, blending razor-sharp analysis with a preacher’s gift for turning data into persuasive speeches.
Timeline
-
Draft1 June 2022
-
Vote Open1 June 2022
-
Vote Closed31 July 2022
-
Did Not Become Law31 July 2022
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Senate
FailedFor: 38 / 348 seats (10.9%)
Against: 262 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 48
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 119 | No | we can support only art.2 |
| The Marianne Liberty Alliance Proposer | 38 | Yes | No reason given |
| The National Refoundation Front | 93 | No | We can’t support this bill |
| The Social-Democrats | 0 | No | We do not support this proposal. |
| The United Conservatives | 50 | No | If you keep immigration as is, i would vote yes. |
National Assembly
FailedFor: 92 / 577 seats (15.9%)
Against: 375 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 110
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 133 | No | we can support only art.2 |
| The Marianne Liberty Alliance Proposer | 92 | Yes | No reason given |
| The National Refoundation Front | 126 | No | We can’t support this bill |
| The Social-Democrats | 17 | No | We do not support this proposal. |
| The United Conservatives | 99 | No | If you keep immigration as is, i would vote yes. |
Presidency
PassedFor: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Marianne Liberty Alliance Proposer | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“we can support only art.2”
“We can’t support this bill”
“If you keep immigration as is, i would vote yes.”