These reforms modernize justice and privacy: escalating mandatory minimums target violent recidivists while strict privacy protections safeguard digital rights from overreach.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Repeat Offender Sentencing |
"Three strikes" — life on third serious offence
|
Escalating mandatory minimums
|
|
| 2 | State Surveillance Powers |
Targeted surveillance (court order required; independent oversight commissioner)
|
Strict privacy protections (right to encryption; no bulk data collection; facial recognition banned)
|
Party
A party of the people for the people. Strong hands build strong walls. No one left behind.
Core pillars
Activist · Age 56
Juliette Roussel’s unshakable ideals and theatrical flair once landed her in front of a judge for a protest gone viral—yet her magnetic presence and refusal to back down have turned her into a living symbol of resistance.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 163 / 348 seats (46.8%)
Against: 97 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 88
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alternative For Marianne | 35 | No | We see no reason to support a bill forwarded by a party with no seats and no votes. They had their chance but blew it. |
| The Left Proposer | 68 | Yes | No reason given |
| The Marianne Liberty Alliance | 62 | No | We wish to keep the court order system |
| The Social-Democrats | 69 | Yes | We agree with this proposal. |
| Together For Marianne | 26 | Yes | We are in favor of strengthening digital security, there is no doubt about that, and we are also in full support of the first article. This is what the New Marianne needs |
For: 192 / 577 seats (33.3%)
Against: 218 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 167
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alternative For Marianne | 74 | No | We see no reason to support a bill forwarded by a party with no seats and no votes. They had their chance but blew it. |
| The Left Proposer | 108 | Yes | No reason given |
| The Marianne Liberty Alliance | 144 | No | We wish to keep the court order system |
| The Social-Democrats | 59 | Yes | We agree with this proposal. |
| Together For Marianne | 25 | Yes | We are in favor of strengthening digital security, there is no doubt about that, and we are also in full support of the first article. This is what the New Marianne needs |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 1
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We wish to keep the court order system”
“We are in favor of strengthening digital security, there is no doubt about that, and we are also in full support of the first article. This is what the New Marianne needs”
“We agree with this proposal.”
“We see no reason to support a bill forwarded by a party with no seats and no votes. They had their chance but blew it.”