“This social-democratic bill is an absurdly confiscatory measure that will destroy our companies' competitiveness and drive away talent. By arbitrarily capping the highest salaries at ten times the lowest wage, this text punishes excellence, effort, and entrepreneurial success. Instead of helping workers, such a collectivist drift discourages investment, drives executives and high-performing businesses out of the country, and chokes the economy through egalitarian bureaucracy. It is the triumph of ideological jealousy over economic reality. We vote no to this socialist poison!”
Cap the Gap: Yes to Fair Wages for All of 2022
Rationale
Vote yes to cap top pay at 10x the lowest wage. This law directly lifts up workers and fights extreme economic greed. We can build a fairer economy where everyone shares in the success. We can create a society where everyones hard work pays off.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Minimum Wage Policy |
Basic minimum wage
|
Maximum wage cap (no one may earn more than 10x the lowest-paid worker)
|
1
Minimum Wage PolicyProposer
Party
The Social-Democrats
A Democratic Socialist Movement that focuses on the citizens needs and the regular people. The right of free education, healthcare, and fair wages shall be for everyone.
Core pillars
Antoine Clement
Activist · Age 27
Raised in a struggling industrial town, Antoine Clement cut his teeth leading protests before his fiery speeches made him the youngest rising star in grassroots politics—a man who speaks for the voiceless and dreams of a revolution from below.
Timeline
-
Draft14 June 2022
-
Vote Open14 June 2022
-
Vote Closed13 August 2022
-
Did Not Become Law13 August 2022
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Senate
FailedFor: 0 / 348 seats (0.0%)
Against: 181 · Abstained: 161 · Not voted: 6
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 161 | Abstain | We undertsand this proposal rationale but it woul be better introduce a living minimum wage instead of putting a maximum wage cap |
| The Marianne Liberty Alliance | 38 | No | Yes, let us further out unemployment, great idea |
| The National Refoundation Front | 93 | No | This social-democratic bill is an absurdly confiscatory measure that will destroy our companies' competitiveness and drive away talent. By arbitrarily capping the highest salaries at ten times the lowest wage, this text punishes excellence, effort, and entrepreneurial success. Instead of helping workers, such a collectivist drift discourages investment, drives executives and high-performing businesses out of the country, and chokes the economy through egalitarian bureaucracy. It is the triumph of ideological jealousy over economic reality. We vote no to this socialist poison! |
| The Social-Democrats Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| The United Conservatives | 50 | No | This punishes just punishes high-quality workers. we don't support this bill. |
National Assembly
FailedFor: 17 / 577 seats (2.9%)
Against: 317 · Abstained: 272 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 272 | Abstain | We undertsand this proposal rationale but it woul be better introduce a living minimum wage instead of putting a maximum wage cap |
| The Marianne Liberty Alliance | 92 | No | Yes, let us further out unemployment, great idea |
| The National Refoundation Front | 126 | No | This social-democratic bill is an absurdly confiscatory measure that will destroy our companies' competitiveness and drive away talent. By arbitrarily capping the highest salaries at ten times the lowest wage, this text punishes excellence, effort, and entrepreneurial success. Instead of helping workers, such a collectivist drift discourages investment, drives executives and high-performing businesses out of the country, and chokes the economy through egalitarian bureaucracy. It is the triumph of ideological jealousy over economic reality. We vote no to this socialist poison! |
| The Social-Democrats Proposer | 17 | Yes | No reason given |
| The United Conservatives | 99 | No | This punishes just punishes high-quality workers. we don't support this bill. |
Presidency
FailedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Marianne Liberty Alliance | 1 | No | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“Yes, let us further out unemployment, great idea”
“We undertsand this proposal rationale but it woul be better introduce a living minimum wage instead of putting a maximum wage cap”
“This punishes just punishes high-quality workers. we don't support this bill.”