“We oppose this bill.”
Break and Removal Act of 2020
Rationale
The invaders are pouring in, destroying our country and ruining our schools and hospitals! Our borders are wide open, total disaster! We are enacting the Break and Removal Act right now to deport criminal illegals and save America! Make our nation great and safe again!
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Asylum & Refugees |
Meet international obligations only
|
Offshore processing and detention
|
|
| 2 | Citizenship Requirements |
Citizenship by birth; naturalisation after 2 years' residency
|
Citizenship by blood only (jus sanguinis); 15-year residency for naturalisation
|
|
| 3 | Deportation |
Case-by-case with full appeal rights
|
Automatic removal, limited appeals
|
|
| 4 | Immigration Quota Policy |
No quotas, open immigration
|
Severely limited immigration
|
|
| 5 | Integration Requirements |
Standard language/civics requirements
|
Strict language + values tests, mandatory classes
|
1
Asylum & Refugees2
Citizenship Requirements3
Deportation4
Immigration Quota Policy5
Integration RequirementsProposer
Party
The National Refoundation Front
The National Refoundation Front is the bold voice of a new era. We stand for uncompromising national sovereignty, strict border security, and a dynamic free-market economy. By restoring our foundational values and unleashing our true potential, we are building a stronger future.
Core pillars
Caroline Chevalier
Activist · Age 48
Caroline Chevalier parlayed a short-lived acting career into a cult-like following as a media-savvy provocateur, using her celebrity to turn policy debates into viral spectacles—and her loyalty to the leadership into an unshakable power base.
Timeline
-
Draft24 October 2020
-
Vote Open24 October 2020
-
Vote Closed23 December 2020
-
Did Not Become Law23 December 2020
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Senate
FailedFor: 135 / 348 seats (38.8%)
Against: 145 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 68
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Democrats (D) | 0 | Abstain | Section 2 is a bit hash. |
| The Greens Of Marianne | 86 | No | We oppose this bill. |
| The Marianne Liberty Alliance | 59 | No | We stand on improving the immigration process and maintaining people's already existing citizenship, not undoing it. |
| The National Refoundation Front Proposer | 135 | Yes | No reason given |
National Assembly
FailedFor: 259 / 577 seats (44.9%)
Against: 296 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 22
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Democrats (D) | 0 | Abstain | Section 2 is a bit hash. |
| The Greens Of Marianne | 183 | No | We oppose this bill. |
| The Marianne Liberty Alliance | 113 | No | We stand on improving the immigration process and maintaining people's already existing citizenship, not undoing it. |
| The National Refoundation Front Proposer | 259 | Yes | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 218 | Not voted |
Presidency
PassedFor: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| The National Refoundation Front Proposer | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We stand on improving the immigration process and maintaining people's already existing citizenship, not undoing it.”
“Section 2 is a bit hash.”