Asylum And Refugee Standards Amendment of 2022 - Marianne

Rationale

This change ensures compliance with international refugee laws, protecting vulnerable individuals fleeing persecution while preventing misuse of asylum systems.

Proposed Changes

	Law	Previous		Proposed
1	Asylum & Refugees	"Asylum seekers are economic migrants" - asylum claims closed		Meet international obligations only

1

Asylum & Refugees

Previous law

"Asylum seekers are economic migrants" - asylum claims closed

Meet international obligations only

Proposer

Party

The Left

A party of the people for the people. Strong hands build strong walls. No one left behind.

Core pillars

AF

Antoine Fournier

Presidency · Age 48

354,139 social followers

Born into old money, his natural magnetism and sharp strategic mind positioned him as a rising star, though his privileged background occasionally clashed with his party’s populist rhetoric.

🚀 Ambitious 🔬 Analytical ✨ Charismatic 💰 Wealthy

Timeline

Draft

22 February 2022
Vote Open

22 February 2022
Vote Closed

23 April 2022
Became Law

23 April 2022

Vote tally

Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.

Senate

Passed

157Yes 143No 48Not voted 348 seats

For: 157 / 348 seats (45.1%)

Against: 143 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 48

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 52.3%)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
The Left Proposer	119	Yes	No reason given
The Marianne Liberty Alliance	38	Yes	We support this even if it isn't far enough.
The National Refoundation Front	93	No	This lax bill is a total capitulation to uncontrolled migration flows. By reopening the floodgates of asylum under alleged international obligations, it turns its back on firmness and sacrifices the protection of our national borders. Allowing our sovereignty to be trampled under the guise of good intentions jeopardizes the stability of our country and the security of our fellow citizens. Opening our doors wide without discernment encourages underground smuggling networks and suffocates our already drained public services. Instead of giving in to the left's third-worldist catechism, the state must enforce order and the national interest. We refuse this submission and vote firmly no to this text that sells out our future!
The United Conservatives	50	No	No, this will cause cultural separation, and violence. Look at Europe.

National Assembly

Failed

236Yes 249No 92Not voted 577 seats

For: 236 / 577 seats (40.9%)

Against: 249 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 92

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 48.7%)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
The Left Proposer	142	Yes	No reason given
The Marianne Liberty Alliance	94	Yes	We support this even if it isn't far enough.
The National Refoundation Front	168	No	This lax bill is a total capitulation to uncontrolled migration flows. By reopening the floodgates of asylum under alleged international obligations, it turns its back on firmness and sacrifices the protection of our national borders. Allowing our sovereignty to be trampled under the guise of good intentions jeopardizes the stability of our country and the security of our fellow citizens. Opening our doors wide without discernment encourages underground smuggling networks and suffocates our already drained public services. Instead of giving in to the left's third-worldist catechism, the state must enforce order and the national interest. We refuse this submission and vote firmly no to this text that sells out our future!
The United Conservatives	81	No	No, this will cause cultural separation, and violence. Look at Europe.

Presidency

Passed

1Yes 0No 0Not voted 1 seat

For: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)

Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0

Passes unless the office holder votes against (abstention counts as pass)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
The Left Proposer	1	Yes	No reason given

Voting record

Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.

The National Refoundation Front

Voted March 1, 2022

No

“This lax bill is a total capitulation to uncontrolled migration flows. By reopening the floodgates of asylum under alleged international obligations, it turns its back on firmness and sacrifices the protection of our national borders. Allowing our sovereignty to be trampled under the guise of good intentions jeopardizes the stability of our country and the security of our fellow citizens. Opening our doors wide without discernment encourages underground smuggling networks and suffocates our already drained public services. Instead of giving in to the left's third-worldist catechism, the state must enforce order and the national interest. We refuse this submission and vote firmly no to this text that sells out our future!”

The Marianne Liberty Alliance

Voted Feb. 24, 2022

Yes

“We support this even if it isn't far enough.”

The United Conservatives

Voted Feb. 23, 2022

No

“No, this will cause cultural separation, and violence. Look at Europe.”