“This conservative bill is a deadly bureaucratic drag on technological innovation and our country's competitiveness. By imposing strict licenses, heavy safety audits, and a total ban on AI surveillance and facial recognition, this text paralyzes our tech sector and dooms us to dependence on foreign powers. Instead of unleashing energies and embracing progress, it caves to technophobia and arbitrarily stifles the development of artificial intelligence. It is a timid, backward-looking vision that weighs down our digital future. We vote no to this sterile hindrance!”
AI Regulation Bill of 2022
Rationale
AI is a growing concern for many people, this act puts regulation in place, restricts surveillance and ensures safety for our citizens
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Automation & the Workforce |
Market-led automation
|
Permit automation with strong retraining/transition rights
|
|
| 2 | AI Surveillance & Predictive Policing |
Regulated, warrant-based, targeted use
|
Ban AI surveillance & facial recognition
|
|
| 3 | AI Development & Safety |
Light-touch, pro-innovation
|
Strict licensing, safety audits, liability
|
1
Automation & the Workforce2
AI Surveillance & Predictive Policing3
AI Development & SafetyProposer
Party
The United Conservatives
The United Conservatives builds a better and brighter future for the young population
Core pillars
Charles David
Activist · Age 38
A sharp-elbowed strategist who cut his teeth in corporate communications before pivoting to politics, Charles David is the architect of hard-nosed campaign tactics, using media manipulation and cold data to crush opponents in pursuit of power.
Timeline
-
Draft10 April 2022
-
Vote Open10 April 2022
-
Vote Closed9 June 2022
-
Became Law9 June 2022
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Senate
PassedFor: 169 / 348 seats (48.6%)
Against: 131 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 48
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 119 | Yes | We support this proposal |
| The Marianne Liberty Alliance | 38 | No | We won't let economic progress and general development be destroyed by rent seeking |
| The National Refoundation Front | 93 | No | This conservative bill is a deadly bureaucratic drag on technological innovation and our country's competitiveness. By imposing strict licenses, heavy safety audits, and a total ban on AI surveillance and facial recognition, this text paralyzes our tech sector and dooms us to dependence on foreign powers. Instead of unleashing energies and embracing progress, it caves to technophobia and arbitrarily stifles the development of artificial intelligence. It is a timid, backward-looking vision that weighs down our digital future. We vote no to this sterile hindrance! |
| The United Conservatives Proposer | 50 | Yes | No reason given |
National Assembly
FailedFor: 223 / 577 seats (38.6%)
Against: 262 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 92
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 142 | Yes | We support this proposal |
| The Marianne Liberty Alliance | 94 | No | We won't let economic progress and general development be destroyed by rent seeking |
| The National Refoundation Front | 168 | No | This conservative bill is a deadly bureaucratic drag on technological innovation and our country's competitiveness. By imposing strict licenses, heavy safety audits, and a total ban on AI surveillance and facial recognition, this text paralyzes our tech sector and dooms us to dependence on foreign powers. Instead of unleashing energies and embracing progress, it caves to technophobia and arbitrarily stifles the development of artificial intelligence. It is a timid, backward-looking vision that weighs down our digital future. We vote no to this sterile hindrance! |
| The United Conservatives Proposer | 81 | Yes | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 218 | Not voted |
Presidency
PassedFor: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We won't let economic progress and general development be destroyed by rent seeking”
“We support this proposal”