Lysenne
Proposals
Tech-Environment Compromise Bill of 2024

Legislative Bill · Lysenne

Tech-Environment Compromise Bill of 2024

Proposed by Renaissance · fronted by Pierre Roussel

Opened

19 Jun 2024

Voting closes

18 Aug 2024

Chambers

2 legislatures

Articles

3 changes

Rationale

This proposal is trying to balance free market growth incentives with guaranteed access to the internet.

Proposed Changes

	Law	Previous	Proposed
1	Broadband & Digital Access	Subsidies for rural and hard-to-reach areas	Universal service obligation; every home entitled to a connection
2	Carbon Pricing	Low carbon price on heavy industry only	No carbon price
3	Industrial Pollution & Water	Basic emission and discharge limits	Industry sets its own standards

1

Broadband & Digital Access

Previous law

Subsidies for rural and hard-to-reach areas

Universal service obligation; every home entitled to a connection

2

Carbon Pricing

Previous law

Low carbon price on heavy industry only

No carbon price

3

Industrial Pollution & Water

Previous law

Basic emission and discharge limits

Industry sets its own standards

Proposer

Party

Renaissance

We advocate a dirigiste economic model with military Keynesianism under strict republican values. Vote Renaissance for a youthful, dynamic and centralised republic.

Core pillars

Pierre Roussel

Presidency · Age 56

424,097 social followers

A passionate political activist dedicated to making a difference.

🎖️ Former Military 🌟 Idealist 🏙️ Street Smart 🔗 Well Connected

Timeline

Draft

19 June 2024
Vote Open

19 June 2024
Vote Closed

18 August 2024
Became Law

18 August 2024

Vote tally

Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.

Senate

Passed

154Yes 0No 194Not voted 348 seats

For: 154 / 348 seats (44.3%)

Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 194

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 100.0%)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Democratic-Republican	0	No	"Do we want to leave people nd generations to suffer the consequences? While i support article I,I cannot support Article II & III because article II just stipulates that carbon price was on heavy industries only nd letting and govt.making it eyes fully blind towards industries or corvmporations practices puts civillian's interests in harm."
Libertary Front	46	Yes	This would lower the burden on our industry.
Renaissance Proposer	108	Yes	No reason given
Empty seats	125	Not voted

National Assembly

Passed

265Yes 0No 312Not voted 577 seats

For: 265 / 577 seats (45.9%)

Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 312

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 100.0%)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Democratic-Republican	0	No	"Do we want to leave people nd generations to suffer the consequences? While i support article I,I cannot support Article II & III because article II just stipulates that carbon price was on heavy industries only nd letting and govt.making it eyes fully blind towards industries or corvmporations practices puts civillian's interests in harm."
Libertary Front	28	Yes	This would lower the burden on our industry.
Renaissance Proposer	237	Yes	No reason given
Empty seats	240	Not voted

Presidency

Passed

1Yes 0No 0Not voted 1 seat

For: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)

Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0

Passes unless the office holder votes against (abstention counts as pass)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Pierre Roussel Proposer	1	Yes	No reason given

Voting record

Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.

Democratic-Republican

Voted Aug. 1, 2024

“"Do we want to leave people nd generations to suffer the consequences? While i support article I,I cannot support Article II & III because article II just stipulates that carbon price was on heavy industries only nd letting and govt.making it eyes fully blind towards industries or corvmporations practices puts civillian's interests in harm."”

Libertary Front

Voted June 27, 2024

Yes

“This would lower the burden on our industry.”