Supply Side Economics Act of 2024 - Lysenne

Rationale

These reforms modernise markets, education and trade to boost growth, lower costs and unlock opportunity for all citizens.

Proposed Changes

	Law	Previous	Proposed
1	Agricultural Market Regime	Mixed regime: tariffs on some staples, intervention only in a crisis	Open agricultural trade; intervention only in emergencies
2	Retail Planning & Licensing	Planning permission required for large stores; otherwise open	Presumption in favour of new stores; no size limits
3	Price-Gouging Regulation	Temporary price caps on essentials in declared emergencies	Sellers must justify large price rises publicly; no caps
4	Online Retail & Marketplaces	Marketplaces liable for illegal or unsafe third-party goods; standard returns rights	Digital-first: e-signatures, no local-presence rules, open cross-border selling
5	Vocational & Technical Education	Employer-led apprenticeships alongside the academic route	Universal access to vocational and technical training, with a guaranteed apprenticeship place for every school-leaver

1

Agricultural Market Regime

Previous law

Mixed regime: tariffs on some staples, intervention only in a crisis

Open agricultural trade; intervention only in emergencies

2

Retail Planning & Licensing

Previous law

Planning permission required for large stores; otherwise open

Presumption in favour of new stores; no size limits

3

Price-Gouging Regulation

Previous law

Temporary price caps on essentials in declared emergencies

Sellers must justify large price rises publicly; no caps

4

Online Retail & Marketplaces

Previous law

Marketplaces liable for illegal or unsafe third-party goods; standard returns rights

Digital-first: e-signatures, no local-presence rules, open cross-border selling

5

Vocational & Technical Education

Previous law

Employer-led apprenticeships alongside the academic route

Universal access to vocational and technical training, with a guaranteed apprenticeship place for every school-leaver

Proposer

Party

Renaissance

We advocate a dirigiste economic model with military Keynesianism under strict republican values. Vote Renaissance for a youthful, dynamic and centralised republic.

Core pillars

Pierre Roussel

Presidency · Age 56

424,097 social followers

A passionate political activist dedicated to making a difference.

🎖️ Former Military 🌟 Idealist 🏙️ Street Smart 🔗 Well Connected

Timeline

Draft

3 October 2024
Vote Open

3 October 2024
Vote Closed

2 December 2024
Became Law

2 December 2024

Vote tally

Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.

Senate

Passed

108Yes 62No 178Not voted 348 seats

For: 108 / 348 seats (31.0%)

Against: 62 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 178

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 63.5%)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Libertary Front	46	No	Libertary Front votes NO because, while we support free markets, deregulation and entrepreneurship, this proposal goes too far by completely opening the agricultural market to unrestricted foreign competition. Protecting a fair competitive environment for domestic producers is essential. We cannot support the entire package when one of its core measures conflicts with that principle.
Monarchists	16	No	this is completely anti small retailer!!!
Renaissance Proposer	108	Yes	No reason given
Empty seats	125	Not voted

National Assembly

Passed

138Yes 129No 310Not voted 577 seats

For: 138 / 577 seats (23.9%)

Against: 129 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 310

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 51.7%)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Libertary Front	96	No	Libertary Front votes NO because, while we support free markets, deregulation and entrepreneurship, this proposal goes too far by completely opening the agricultural market to unrestricted foreign competition. Protecting a fair competitive environment for domestic producers is essential. We cannot support the entire package when one of its core measures conflicts with that principle.
Monarchists	33	No	this is completely anti small retailer!!!
Renaissance Proposer	138	Yes	No reason given
Empty seats	240	Not voted

Presidency

Passed

1Yes 0No 0Not voted 1 seat

For: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)

Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0

Passes unless the office holder votes against (abstention counts as pass)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Pierre Roussel Proposer	1	Yes	No reason given

Voting record

Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.

Libertary Front

Voted Oct. 14, 2024

No

“Libertary Front votes NO because, while we support free markets, deregulation and entrepreneurship, this proposal goes too far by completely opening the agricultural market to unrestricted foreign competition. Protecting a fair competitive environment for domestic producers is essential. We cannot support the entire package when one of its core measures conflicts with that principle.”

Monarchists

Voted Oct. 3, 2024

No

“this is completely anti small retailer!!!”