Lysenne
Proposals
Restrict Frontier AI Act of …

Legislative Bill · Lysenne

Restrict Frontier AI Act of 2024

Proposed by Monarchists · fronted by Rose David

Opened

4 Oct 2024

Voting closes

3 Dec 2024

Chambers

2 legislatures

Articles

3 changes

Rationale

These changes address public safety risks, workforce disruption, and digital inequality by prioritising safety, worker protection, and universal free access over unchecked AI growth and profit-driven broadband.

Proposed Changes

	Law	Previous	Proposed
1	AI Development & Safety	No restrictions; accelerate AI	Strict licensing, safety audits, liability
2	Automation & the Workforce	Actively incentivise automation	Permit automation with strong retraining/transition rights
3	Broadband & Digital Access	Universal service obligation; every home entitled to a connection	Free state broadband for all; private providers banned

1

AI Development & Safety

Previous law

No restrictions; accelerate AI

Strict licensing, safety audits, liability

2

Automation & the Workforce

Previous law

Actively incentivise automation

Permit automation with strong retraining/transition rights

3

Broadband & Digital Access

Previous law

Universal service obligation; every home entitled to a connection

Free state broadband for all; private providers banned

Proposer

Party

Monarchists

We seek the restoration of a divinely appointed monarch.

Core pillars

Rose David

Activist · Age 47

159,053 social followers

Once a rebellious pop star whose fiery anthems earned both adoration and controversy, Rose David traded the spotlight for the political stage, where her pragmatic charm and relentless ambition now make her the party’s most magnetic but unpredictable rising star.

🚀 Ambitious ⭐ Celebrity ⚖️ Pragmatist 🔥 Firebrand

Timeline

Draft

4 October 2024
Vote Open

4 October 2024
Vote Closed

3 December 2024
Did Not Become Law

3 December 2024

Vote tally

Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.

Senate

Failed

16Yes 154No 178Not voted 348 seats

For: 16 / 348 seats (4.6%)

Against: 154 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 178

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 9.4%)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Libertary Front	46	No	While we are not against some regulation on AI development in order to keep our country safe. We strongly disagree with these measures, which are totally unnecessary and are against our core principles.
Monarchists Proposer	16	Yes	No reason given
Renaissance	108	No	these proposals would crash our tech sector!
Empty seats	125	Not voted

National Assembly

Failed

33Yes 234No 310Not voted 577 seats

For: 33 / 577 seats (5.7%)

Against: 234 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 310

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 12.4%)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Libertary Front	96	No	While we are not against some regulation on AI development in order to keep our country safe. We strongly disagree with these measures, which are totally unnecessary and are against our core principles.
Monarchists Proposer	33	Yes	No reason given
Renaissance	138	No	these proposals would crash our tech sector!
Empty seats	240	Not voted

Presidency

Failed

0Yes 1No 0Not voted 1 seat

For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)

Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0

Passes unless the office holder votes against (abstention counts as pass)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Pierre Roussel	1	No	No reason given

Voting record

Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.

Libertary Front

Voted Oct. 14, 2024

“While we are not against some regulation on AI development in order to keep our country safe. We strongly disagree with these measures, which are totally unnecessary and are against our core principles.”

Renaissance

Voted Oct. 4, 2024

“these proposals would crash our tech sector!”