These changes balance environmental goals with economic realities, ensuring affordable solutions while maintaining steady progress toward sustainability without overburdening households or businesses.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Single-Use Plastics |
Ban single-use plastics outright
|
Phased restrictions and charges
|
|
| 2 | Vehicle Emissions Standards |
Emissions limits with gradual phase-in for new vehicles
|
No vehicle emissions standards whatsoever
|
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 99 / 348 seats (28.4%)
Against: 125 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 124
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic-Republican | 0 | No | Disagree with the second article. |
| Libertary Front Proposer | 46 | Yes | No reason given |
| Liquid Democrats | 53 | Yes | Good for the expansion of personal rights. |
| Lysenne Reform League | 78 | No | We disagree with second proposal |
| New Centre | 47 | No | We must care for the environment |
| Empty seats | 125 | Not voted |
For: 99 / 577 seats (17.2%)
Against: 217 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 261
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic-Republican | 0 | No | Disagree with the second article. |
| Libertary Front Proposer | 28 | Yes | No reason given |
| Liquid Democrats | 71 | Yes | Good for the expansion of personal rights. |
| Lysenne Reform League | 122 | No | We disagree with second proposal |
| New Centre | 95 | No | We must care for the environment |
| Empty seats | 240 | Not voted |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 1
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pierre Roussel | 1 | Not voted |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“Disagree with the second article.”
“Good for the expansion of personal rights.”
“We must care for the environment”
“We disagree with second proposal”