These changes address inequitable healthcare access, preventable diet-related diseases, and unmet mental health needs by ensuring universal, high-quality care and proactive public health measures.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Healthcare System Model |
Public system with private top-ups
|
Single public system, free at point of use
|
|
| 2 | Public Health & Nutrition |
Labelling and ad limits for children
|
Bans on junk-food ads, mandatory reformulation
|
|
| 3 | Mental Health Provision |
Expanded but not guaranteed access
|
Legal right to timely mental-health care
|
Party
A party of builders and healers crafting a future where no one is left adrift and every voice shapes the dawn
Core pillars
Activist · Age 32
A 26-year-old former investment banker who walked away from high finance after witnessing its disconnect from everyday people, now wielding sharp media instincts to expose systemic flaws and rally support behind pragmatic reform.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 226 / 348 seats (64.9%)
Against: 102 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 20
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monarchists | 102 | No | this is unnecessary, the current system is fine |
| Renaissance | 190 | Yes | given the large increase in GDP, we can afford this policy |
| Social Democratic Front Proposer | 36 | Yes | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 125 | Not voted |
For: 387 / 577 seats (67.1%)
Against: 174 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 16
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monarchists | 174 | No | this is unnecessary, the current system is fine |
| Renaissance | 337 | Yes | given the large increase in GDP, we can afford this policy |
| Social Democratic Front Proposer | 50 | Yes | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 240 | Not voted |
For: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Renaissance | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“this is unnecessary, the current system is fine”
“given the large increase in GDP, we can afford this policy”