“its a simple and effective policy”
Citizenship Requirement Reform Act of 2024
Rationale
Strengthens national identity and reduces demographic pressures by prioritizing cultural ties over birthright citizenship.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Citizenship Requirements |
Citizenship by birth on national soil and naturalisation after 5 years' residency
|
Citizenship by blood only (jus sanguinis); 15-year residency for naturalisation
|
1
Citizenship RequirementsProposer
Party
Libertary Front
The Libertary Front fights to reclaim your future from overreach with ironclad borders and unbreakable liberty for every citizen. Reclaim your jobs and traditional structure.
Core pillars
Mathis Durand
Activist · Age 45
Mathis Durand abandoned a lucrative career in finance to pursue political power, applying his former banker’s precision to campaigns while delighting—or alarming—observers with his eccentric, boundary-pushing tactics.
Timeline
-
Draft29 April 2024
-
Vote Open12 May 2024
-
Vote Closed11 July 2024
-
Did Not Become Law11 July 2024
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Senate
FailedFor: 62 / 348 seats (17.8%)
Against: 178 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 108
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic-Republican | 0 | No | No law should be based on race and ethnicity or religion. |
| Libertary Front Proposer | 46 | Yes | No reason given |
| Liquid Democrats | 53 | No | This legislation is xenophobic in nature. |
| Lysenne Reform League | 78 | No | This is extreme. We can't support it |
| Monarchists | 16 | Yes | its a simple and effective policy |
| New Centre | 47 | No | We cannot support this extreme right-wing reform by which one can't be a citizen just because one's parents weren't |
| Empty seats | 125 | Not voted |
National Assembly
FailedFor: 52 / 577 seats (9.0%)
Against: 288 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 237
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic-Republican | 0 | No | No law should be based on race and ethnicity or religion. |
| Libertary Front Proposer | 28 | Yes | No reason given |
| Liquid Democrats | 71 | No | This legislation is xenophobic in nature. |
| Lysenne Reform League | 122 | No | This is extreme. We can't support it |
| Monarchists | 24 | Yes | its a simple and effective policy |
| New Centre | 95 | No | We cannot support this extreme right-wing reform by which one can't be a citizen just because one's parents weren't |
| Empty seats | 240 | Not voted |
Presidency
PassedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 1
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pierre Roussel | 1 | Not voted |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We cannot support this extreme right-wing reform by which one can't be a citizen just because one's parents weren't”
“No law should be based on race and ethnicity or religion.”
“This is extreme. We can't support it”
“This legislation is xenophobic in nature.”