Anti Laicite Act of 2017
Rationale
These changes strengthen moral education, support faith-based social welfare, and protect vulnerable lives by restoring faith, service, and life’s sanctity.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Religious Education in Schools |
Strictly secular education
|
Mandatory religious instruction
|
|
| 2 | Religious Observation Policy |
Permit religion with no state support (neutral tax treatment; no grants)
|
Direct state grants to religious organizations for social services
|
|
| 3 | Assisted Dying Policy |
Broad right-to-die for chronic physical or psychological suffering
|
Assisted dying aggressively prosecuted; life sentences for those involved
|
1
Religious Education in Schools2
Religious Observation Policy3
Assisted Dying PolicyProposer
Party
Les Revivalistes
Les Revivalistes seek to renew the sacred covenant between faith and nation. We advocate for faith in the public square, strong social safety nets and regionalism.
Core pillars
François Fontaine
Activist · Age 67
Once a fiery seminary student expelled for radical sermons, he now turns his pulpit into political battle with a preacher’s fervor and a rebel’s swagger.
Timeline
-
Draft6 January 2017
-
Vote Open6 January 2017
-
Withdrawn12 January 2017
-
Never Became Law12 January 2017
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Senate
FailedFor: 0 / 348 seats (0.0%)
Against: 108 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 240
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Futur Nationale | 0 | No | No reason given |
| Les Revivalistes Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Renaissance | 108 | No | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 125 | Not voted |
National Assembly
FailedFor: 0 / 577 seats (0.0%)
Against: 138 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 439
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Futur Nationale | 0 | No | No reason given |
| Les Revivalistes Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Renaissance | 138 | No | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 240 | Not voted |
Presidency
PassedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 1