Proposed by Renaissance in Lysenne
Opening this package cost 60 PP.
Current wording is shown as it was when voting began.
By allowing two candidates to face off in the second round, we will be able to come up with a winner with broad appeal.
For: 223 / 348 seats (64.1%) — needs 66.6%
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 125
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Libertary Front | 46 | Yes | We agree on this proposal |
| Liquid Democrats | 53 | Yes | This expands electoral accountability. |
| Monarchists | 16 | Yes | sounds like a good reform |
| Renaissance Proposer | 108 | Yes | No reason given |
For: 337 / 577 seats (58.4%) — needs 66.6%
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 240
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Libertary Front | 96 | Yes | We agree on this proposal |
| Liquid Democrats | 70 | Yes | This expands electoral accountability. |
| Monarchists | 33 | Yes | sounds like a good reform |
| Renaissance Proposer | 138 | Yes | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“This expands electoral accountability.”
“sounds like a good reform”
“We agree on this proposal”