“I think phones in schools are fine for entertainment and emergencies. If its not interrupting education then it doesn't need to be fixed. Students have a right to access thier personal tools and who are we to say no to that”
School Policy Modernization Act of 2024
Rationale
We believe that many children nowadays ignore education by using gadgets in class. We propose making learning more effective and, in return, reducing the duration of the education process.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mobile Phones in Schools |
No restrictions
|
Left to teacher discretion
|
|
| 2 | School Leaving Age |
Compulsory education/training to 18
|
Compulsory to 16
|
1
Mobile Phones in Schools2
School Leaving AgeProposer
Party
Javoscan Social Alliance "future"
We are a party that advocates for market freedom and a strong, independent economy; to this end, we seek peaceful solutions through diplomacy, improve the quality of education and the quality of life, and protect democracy.
Core pillars
Ernest Lawson
Candidate for President · Age 33
A self-made political operator with deep roots in labor movements, Ernest Lawson leverages his working-class origins and extensive network to rally support, though his silver tongue masks a strategic mind attuned to data and alliances.
Timeline
-
Draft18 June 2024
-
Vote Open18 June 2024
-
Vote Closed17 August 2024
-
Did Not Become Law17 August 2024
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Congress
FailedFor: 61 / 543 seats (11.2%)
Against: 482 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Javoscan Social Alliance "future" Proposer | 61 | Yes | No reason given |
| National Front Of Javosca | 141 | No | Let kids use phones. Yikes. |
| National Republican Front | 0 | Abstain | No reason given |
| Peoples Progressional Front | 113 | No | I think phones in schools are fine for entertainment and emergencies. If its not interrupting education then it doesn't need to be fixed. Students have a right to access thier personal tools and who are we to say no to that |
| Red Green Labor | 228 | No | We reject this proposal |
Senate
FailedFor: 27 / 245 seats (11.0%)
Against: 218 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Javoscan Social Alliance "future" Proposer | 27 | Yes | No reason given |
| National Front Of Javosca | 64 | No | Let kids use phones. Yikes. |
| National Republican Front | 0 | Abstain | No reason given |
| Peoples Progressional Front | 51 | No | I think phones in schools are fine for entertainment and emergencies. If its not interrupting education then it doesn't need to be fixed. Students have a right to access thier personal tools and who are we to say no to that |
| Red Green Labor | 103 | No | We reject this proposal |
Federal-State Governor
FailedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cordelia Johnson | 1 | No | No reason given |
President
FailedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elizabeth Davidson | 1 | No | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“Let kids use phones. Yikes.”
“We reject this proposal”